Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's what gets me.... people whine for small trucks... gm gives a small truck yet wants to be paid for it (and with inflation is in line with S10 pricing, and these trucks are way bigger and nicer with more safety ) and people say "I can buy a fullsize for that" Uh, yeah that's probably why they all quit selling small trucks...........

You can't give somebody less, charge a premium for it, and expect them to be happy ... no matter how dumbed down society is.

 

What's the point of downsizing when you can get a full size for $3k more?

Posted

I see way too many rams with rusted out fender wells here in MI, no thank you!

I live in the south so I'm good. Lol

Posted

Ram has a good thing going price wise with the Express.

 

Generally if the up front price is good, the resale side is horrible.

Then add $10-$12k off of higher end stuff, you may have to drive that Express 'til the wheels fall off.

 

Back to the Colorado/Canyon market. Read where... GM believes that both Chevy and GMC products will offer an interesting proposition to small-CUV shoppers.

If that is the case, cuv buyers will not be directly comparing full size to mid size trucks.

More at link... http://www.autoblog.com/2014/07/29/gm-thinks-colorado-canyon-lure-cuv-buyers/

 

Personally think both trucks will be a small niche market aimed at meeting or offsetting CAFE standards.

With the latter being important in the equation, success is going to be more complicated to measure given

GM has no problem selling higher end Big V8 heavy trucks/SUV's.

  • Like 1
Posted

So let me get this straight. These things are so far off a similarly priced Tacoma it isn't even funny? Well, a limited Tacoma is 36.4k with no options. A SLT canyon is 37.8k with maybe no options or might be loaded? A TRD sport is 33.7k, a Z71 is 34.9 k, so a little more than a grand more than a 10 year old truck with not nearly the amount of features or options, better mpg's, power and performance. Complain complain, they won't even deal on tacoma's either...

 

Comparing them to a full size an SLT Sierra starts at 46k (and it has a bench seat, no buckets at that...), almost 8 grand more and there are a ton of options left to get. You can sticker one of those up above 50k easy. Doesn't sound like they are stepping on much of the toe of the full sizers.

 

Oh but rebates, you don't think you can't widdle down a mid sizer off of the MSRP? Remember, dealing with percentages of price you need more money off the fullsize to get the same percentage off a midsize. Some of you are comparing a truck new 5 years ago, that isn't an apples to apples comparison. The new trucks have gone up in price a descent amount. The same truck 5 years ago at 40k MSRP (CC, Z71, cloth buckets) is now almost 5k more. That is an unfair comparison. How about we compare a truck from the 80's then?

 

This is about right, I would have loved to see them a little cheaper but they are a much better truck with more tech/features and are a little more than a comparable Tacoma and still 6-10k less than a comparable optioned full size at msrp. Compare the correct features, colorado Z71 to the LT Z71, SLT to SLT. Don't say oh the SLE 4x4 is only 3k more after rebates when compared to the SLT Canyon. That isn't a direct comparison.

 

Some of ya'lls remarks and comparisons are just laughable...

 

Tyler

  • Like 2
Posted

We're talking about midsize trucks here. Not the tundra.

 

Starting price on the Tacoma is $18,125.

 

Starting on the Tundra is $26,200.

 

My typo, Tacoma, and yes the regular cab is $18,125 but the Colorado won't come in a regular cab. I'm comparing apples to apples here, and the same cab configuration is priced similar.

Posted

As stated, the MSRP isn't the deciding factor. Incentives will make all the difference. I really like the looks of the new Colorado, but a Silverado for the same money (or just a couple grand more) is a no-brainer. The MSRP is inflated on all GM trucks (in my opinion) so a good incentive/rebate program might make these trucks worth looking at. Otherwise, I'll buy a HD gasser and have a whole lot more truck for the money.

 

Not every one needs or wants a BIG truck. Small is just fine, and saving money on that idea is not bad either. More is not always better. Not understanding that is not something to crow about...

Posted

If your buying a truck to haul stuff, why in the hell would anyone go small??? :confused:

Posted

 

Not every one needs or wants a BIG truck. Small is just fine, and saving money on that idea is not bad either. More is not always better. Not understanding that is not something to crow about...

He never said everyone needs or wants a big truck, he said he personally would rather pay for an HD then a small truck.. Never said anything leading to believe he dosent understand that..

  • Like 2
Posted

 

Not every one needs or wants a BIG truck. Small is just fine, and saving money on that idea is not bad either. More is not always better. Not understanding that is not something to crow about...

 

 

He never said everyone needs or wants a big truck, he said he personally would rather pay for an HD then a small truck.. Never said anything leading to believe he dosent understand that..

 

Exactly. I understand that a small truck will suit some people just fine, and if they can save a few grand in the process, that's even better. I was just sharing my personal opinion (doesn't make it right or wrong) that I would rather pay a few thousand more and have a more capable truck. I've always liked larger trucks, and I actually use my truck as a truck (towing and hauling)...so for me, more is better. Other people may have different wants/needs, and that's just fine.

  • Like 1
Posted

Here's a look some preliminary fuel efficient projections for various vehicle makes and models:

Segment Make & Model 2012 mpg goal 2017 mpg goal 2021 mpg goal 2025 mpg goal

 

 

2012 2017 2021 2025

 

Subcompact Car Kia Soul 34.6 41.7 48.6 58.4

Midrange Sport Car Chevrolet Corvette 33.4 40.0 46.6 56.0

Compact Car Chevrolet Cruze 33.4 40.0 46.6 56.0

Midsize Car Toyota Camry 32.3 38.4 44.8 53.8

Premium Luxury Car BMW 7 Series 28.0 32.7 38.0 45.6

Compact Crossover SUV Ford Escape 29.0 34.9 40.2 48.4

Compact Truck Toyota Tacoma 27.2 31.8 36.6 44.1

Midsize Traditional SUV Ford Explorer 25.9 29.9 34.2 41.2

Minivan Toyota Sienna 24.8 28.3 32.1 38.6

Large Truck Ford F-150 22.3 25.1 25.3 30.2

Source: Edmunds.com

 

 

Posted

And if they can't meet those goals ...... fines from the EPA?

 

Nothing good will come from the government mandating what vehicles "SHOULD" get for mileage. That sort of thing will make today's reliability issues seem like a walk in the park compared to what will come ...

 

I'll believe a 30 mpg F-150 when I see it. How? Plastic frame? 1/2 quart of oil in the engine? 35 horsepower/ 50 ft. lbs. of torque? 22 speed transmission? Nothing good .....

Posted

Seems to me that the pricing is similar to the Toyota & Nissan both of which are old platforms that need refreshed to catch my eye. I test drove a couple Nissan Frontiers before getting my Sierra and they we're OK but, I don't like how choppy the ride was.

 

I've not driven a Taco but, the interior styling doesn't do much for me and when I sat in one it was pretty cramped inside.

 

Its not necessary always a matter of bigger is better but, I doubt that one of these mid sized trucks will get me out of a full size GMC and into a Canyon but, I'd drive a 2500HD with a duramax if I could afford it. With that said if my job were to find me parking in the big city a lot I'd probably be looking at a Canyon.

Posted

These small trucks have their own market... They are not meant to sway people from buying full size trucks or 3/4 ton trucks, they are meant to fulfill the needs of the small truck market. Fortunately there are very few options out there.

Posted

One can only hope we somehow get a congress that will sort out a way to curtail the employment prevention agency's (EPA) absurd CAFE regulations.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think an MSRP of ~$37k loaded doesn't seem too far off the mark. I got my 14 Sierra 4x4 Z71 with a sticker of 43k for 35k, but it was an SLE. I'd imagine the loaded Canyon will drop to low 30's with rebates and such. That's loaded. The meat of the market will be mid-high 20's with nice options. Not too bad. I'm curious to see what the diesel will be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...