Jump to content

Updated - GM To Eliminate Some Car Models - Focus On EVs - Close Some Plants

Gorehamj

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

One of the most popular cars made was the 94-96 impala ss. GM discontinued the rear drive platform to convert the plant for trucks. Why? More profits in trucks and SUVS. People are willing to pay more for a higher seating position, less gas mileage, a worse ride, less performance than the full sized sedan they replaced. Then they’ll put a cap on the back to keep their groceries dry in the bed. A bed that’s shrinking to size of a large sedans trunk to give more cab room. I guess I’m a dying breed. I don’t get the fascination with a pickup as a family vehicle. I’ll take a large sedan any day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

paullgj Enthusiast

paullgj

Posted
Posted

GM has priced me out of the new vehicle market.  Looks like I stay with my low tech 2016 reg cab WT (paid for) forever.  Sure I’d like a new Tahoe Z71 but at $60,000-70,000 no way.!  FWIW I’m in the 70+ age group, never drove Buick’s (always Chevy trucks or Jeep Wranglers), and definitely don’t like the buggy instantly out-of-date infotainment systems.  In addition to the price, the new vehicles all seem to have computerized all wheel or 4wd systems.  Not so good when one of those modules goes south when you’re on a mountain slope rutted dirt track.  

 

My rant.  I see GM and others becoming highly specialized and over priced.

BobHancock Enthusiast

BobHancock

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, pickmeup said:

Buick has nothing most modern car buyers want but it seems to have a audience of the 70 and older crowd . Youth and middle aged could give 2 shits about it.

Hey wait a minute.  At 72 I might resemble that remark, but don't thanks to Chevy trucks with 6.2L engines and Jeeps.  :rolleyes:

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted

Thirty plus years ago GM and the other American automakers dominated the markets with all of their offerings even while Motor Trend and Road & Track whined about how similar the Monte Carlo, Buick Regal and Pontiac Grand Prix were.  They were and made GM a fortune.  Somewhere along the line GM and others started listening to these fools and started building high revving low torque euro style cars that never did hold a candle comfort and ride wise to an American offering.

 

It seems to me that  folks looking for cars have a lot more choices at lower prices with the imports.

 

GM is in for a rude awakening if they think Americans are going to buy those electric cars; ask Musk how well that's working out for him now that the government is not subsidizing them anymore!

 

Buick has become a Chicom car company with a legacy in the USA that will likely end soon.

PhantomSierra16 Enthusiast

PhantomSierra16

Posted
Posted

All I gotta say is GM killed their long-standing American Sedan the Chevy Impala. They ****ed up by 1) Not Sprucing it up enough 2) FAILING TO MARKET IT 3)Horribly Designing it and not touching it since it’s current gen release 4) Failing to compete with the Dodge Charger and 300.

 

How is anyone okay with this? Instead of trying to Save the Impala, GM opted to sell the Holden Comedore (the SS), and not lend anything performance wise to the Impala. ???

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I’ve had 10 rear drive impalas, last one was a 94 ss. We finally found a close match, 2011 Genesis. Probably a Stinger next. I was all for the Chevy ss, the wife didn’t want to part with the Genesis. She couldn’t warm up to the idea of buying a Chevy for 50K, when the Genesis cost us 30K. Even now 8 years later and 92K it still has bumper to bumper warranty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Roscopcoletrain Senior Enthusiast

Roscopcoletrain

Posted
Posted
Quote

GM has confirmed the Oshawa plant news and added to its "Unallocated" list the Lordstown, Ohio and Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant in Detroit. In addition, GM is not planning any products for the Baltimore Operations in White Marsh, Maryland, and the Warren Transmission Operations in Warren, Michigan. 

so they close one plant in Canada and five in the US, but thats Liberals/Trudeau's fault? 

 

this is what I hate so much about politics. Folks so quick to just blame the other side for no reason other than it has to be their fault. 

Jsdirt Senior Enthusiast

Jsdirt

Posted
Posted

Roscoe, I know it's been a couple years, but remember obama's affinity for self-driving cars? Where he'd mention something like this, then suddenly Ford and GM released their plans for their self-driver's by 2021? Do you think, with obama's propensity for overstepping the Constitution via executive orders, that Ford and GM just decided to do this because they agreed with him?

 

Common sense tells me they were strong-armed into this. So now they tool up and prepare for little cars, EV's, and self-drivers .... and Trump wins. I can just hear the collective, "Oh sh!t" from automakers ....

 

So yeah, I agree the libs had a lot to do with this.

 

https://www.wired.com/2016/10/obama-feds-must-guarantee-self-driving-cars-work-everybody/

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, PMurray said:

I find your comments (doubly) offensive.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 

Sorry

 

:)

sheepdawg Enthusiast

sheepdawg

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, yogi89 said:

PMurray, If you'd rather have justin over Trump, then move north.  Amazing how our Canadian friends can understand the situation yet many of my fellow Americans continue to be hood winked by the leftest media.

The government wants to stick it's nose into everything and tell us how to live our lives. If I want a 64 oz. Coke, a wheel barrel full of salt or a gasoline eating vehicle I get it, the government and media be damned.

 

A big +1 to you.

L86 All Terrain Senior Enthusiast

L86 All Terrain

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Roscopcoletrain said:

so they close one plant in Canada and five in the US, but thats Liberals/Trudeau's fault? 

 

this is what I hate so much about politics. Folks so quick to just blame the other side for no reason other than it has to be their fault. 

The plants in the US are all related to the model lines being discontinued. One assembled cars like Oshawa, the others made powertrain parts for said cars. This is all to do with JT's politics, not the fact that GM had to restructure, it's the fact they are up and leaving because business in Ontario sucks. Oshawa also made Silverado and Sierra which the other US plants closing did not, that Oshawa plant had the tools to produce the pick up's for Canada and the Northern States drastically reducing transportation costs from Indiana and Mexico (which gets passed on to you for $1,500 on top of the MSRP). As a business owner I know full-well the types of things JT's gov't has pulled on businesses since election (increasing wages and taxes, increase fuel and energy costs, carbon tax, capital gains changes, family business changes etc.). They are very anti-business especially if you are in an industrial setting , more of a socialist/communist approach to business (gov't owns the businesses, you work for them, as Justin's father did with PetroCanada) If we had good policy and were a profitable place to do business, GM would not abandon Oshawa, they would restructure it. The reason he shot out a bunch of potential tax changes last week was a vain attempt to keep GM in Oshawa, but it wasn't enough. While GM will continue to expand it's Autonomous R&D in the USA, Canada is stuck looking to feed 1,400 people that now are out of work directly due to the previous Ontario Liberals and the current Federal Liberals policies. Not saying Liberals are bad people, most of my family are liberal, but JT's Liberals have the worst economic sense I have ever seen in my 35+ years of being in business. Harper's Cons had some bad policy too but I guarantee the story would differ. Politics is very important, it controls every aspect of our lives and all major business decisions and we should be free to discuss it as we feel fit, in a respectful and courteous manor without hating on each other. 

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, PhantomSierra16 said:

All I gotta say is GM killed their long-standing American Sedan the Chevy Impala. They ****ed up by 1) Not Sprucing it up enough 2) FAILING TO MARKET IT 3)Horribly Designing it and not touching it since it’s current gen release 4) Failing to compete with the Dodge Charger and 300.

 

How is anyone okay with this? Instead of trying to Save the Impala, GM opted to sell the Holden Comedore (the SS), and not lend anything performance wise to the Impala. ???

Long standing since 2000.. a whole whoppin 19 years.  Whoopdie doo. During which time they didn't sell worth a damn except to your favorite rental car fleet.  Why?  Because GM (and Ford with their Taurus) couldn't figure out how to or did not want to build something with the reliability and resale value that made Honda and Crapota sedans popular.   And while the current generation of Impala isn't all that bad (except for the ugly ass end) it was too little too late.  Too many people see GM sedans as tarnished, just like the Ford sedans.  (Which is why the Taurus is going bye bye, thank heavens) But no big surprise to see the Impala on the chopping block.  As for Buick I think GM screwed up when they did away with Hummer, Saturn, Olds, and Pontiac.. It should have been Olds, Pontiac, and Buick.  Saturn's still sold decently and there was promise there with them not being so closely aligned to the other brands vehicles like Olds, Buick, Pontiac, and Chevrolet.  I predict we'll see Chrysler fold and possibly Lincoln as well in due time.  Lincoln just like Buick doesn't sell here at all.  Hell we even saw Crapota do away with the Scion line so even they are not immune. 

SILVER SLED Senior Enthusiast

SILVER SLED

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Colossus said:

Long standing since 2000.. a whole whoppin 19 years.  Whoopdie doo. 

The Impala has basically  been around since 1958. 

SnakeEyeSS Senior Enthusiast

SnakeEyeSS

Posted
Posted

Que the 2019 or 2020 market downturn, when the INSANE debt most Americans have starts to fold in on itself(love how this is completely ignored/ brushed off just like the real estate bubble was) and Toyota and Honda will absolutely rule car market again, and US automakers will be caught with their pants down again. For all the yapping about looking to the future, there will still be a huge near term demand for gas powered cars.  If the debt problems trigger problems before there are car chargers everywhere(yeah, right).

 

Especially for those of us who sometimes like to drive  more than a few hundred miles at a time. I'm not saying gas will spike, I'm saying those who overextended themselves( a massive number of people) will desperately need a car they can actually afford.  And combine that with Amazon about to run the entire world and finally crush the remaining physical retail sector, the number of people needing jobs will go up too, and "Mom n' Pop" will be six feet under.

 

TL;DR trade in values will be fantastic! :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...