Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Current owner of a 2016 Yukon Denali shorty 2wd with no shake/buffeting issues but low speed boom like every other Yukon/Tahoe. I really need a 4wd pickup and was considering GM or the new Titan. I know not every Silverado/Sierra shakes but damn, these posts scare me! Should I stay the hell away or roll the dice? I don't like the Fords (everybody has one), Dodge too unreliable, Tundra is way out of date and offers too few amenities (owned a 2014, stereo was AWFUL, mileage sucked, no auto lights, wipers, push button start, etc.). That leaves GM and Titan. Leaning towards Titan but I'm torn.

Posted

Current owner of a 2016 Yukon Denali shorty 2wd with no shake/buffeting issues but low speed boom like every other Yukon/Tahoe. I really need a 4wd pickup and was considering GM or the new Titan. I know not every Silverado/Sierra shakes but damn, these posts scare me! Should I stay the hell away or roll the dice? I don't like the Fords (everybody has one), Dodge too unreliable, Tundra is way out of date and offers too few amenities (owned a 2014, stereo was AWFUL, mileage sucked, no auto lights, wipers, push button start, etc.). That leaves GM and Titan. Leaning towards Titan but I'm torn.

Drive a Titan and take another look at the Tundra. All of the GM SUVs and trucks are on the same platform.

Posted

Vibration back above 80mph on my truck... ready for a trade in? Who knows, stay tuned!

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

Damn, CJ, hate to hear that! Look at it this way, I have spent over $2000 on parts to find out that it was bad wheels, talk about frustration! :banghead:

 

Now I have to buy new wheels! I was on autotrader Monday myself, but I am too stubborn to give up.

Posted

Current owner of a 2016 Yukon Denali shorty 2wd with no shake/buffeting issues but low speed boom like every other Yukon/Tahoe. I really need a 4wd pickup and was considering GM or the new Titan. I know not every Silverado/Sierra shakes but damn, these posts scare me! Should I stay the hell away or roll the dice? I don't like the Fords (everybody has one), Dodge too unreliable, Tundra is way out of date and offers too few amenities (owned a 2014, stereo was AWFUL, mileage sucked, no auto lights, wipers, push button start, etc.). That leaves GM and Titan. Leaning towards Titan but I'm torn.

Wait and see what the new 18 Tundra will be. I read there will be one out in a February auto show. Should be some changes.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Damn, CJ, hate to hear that! Look at it this way, I have spent over $2000 on parts to find out that it was bad wheels, talk about frustration! :banghead:

 

Now I have to buy new wheels! I was on autotrader Monday myself, but I am too stubborn to give up.

I need a HD truck anyways, I've been pushing the limits, hauling wise, on a 1500

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

Wait and see what the new 18 Tundra will be. I read there will be one out in a February auto show. Should be some changes.

The 18 Tundra is supposed to be a complete redesign, everything from the interior to the mechanicals/ drive line. I considered one before I got the ford but the Tundra was still a great truck. Beware of a first model run after a redesign, always a scary year haha. Anyway, I'd expect a modified version of the 5.7L, 4.6L and addition of a diesel engine, updated transmission (8 or 10 speed), quieter interior etc. heres an article https://carsintrend.com/2018-toyota-tundra/

 

 

Current owner of a 2016 Yukon Denali shorty 2wd with no shake/buffeting issues but low speed boom like every other Yukon/Tahoe. I really need a 4wd pickup and was considering GM or the new Titan. I know not every Silverado/Sierra shakes but damn, these posts scare me! Should I stay the hell away or roll the dice? I don't like the Fords (everybody has one), Dodge too unreliable, Tundra is way out of date and offers too few amenities (owned a 2014, stereo was AWFUL, mileage sucked, no auto lights, wipers, push button start, etc.). That leaves GM and Titan. Leaning towards Titan but I'm torn.

I need a HD truck anyways, I've been pushing the limits, hauling wise, on a 1500

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

F-650 :)

Posted

I am all done with first model year runs.......The Impala from Oshawa was actually Great but now I am hitting the middle to end of model run for the discounts and build quality.....

  • Like 1
Posted

I need a HD truck anyways, I've been pushing the limits, hauling wise, on a 1500

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Just fyi rdnckhntr94; you probably already know this. The current Tundra is basically on a 3/4 ton platform. So, when comparing to the competition it should be compared to their 3/4 ton models. I have only good things to say about the Toyota brand in general, especially their engines as they're pretty much bullet proof. Bought my first Toyota in 1969 when I decided to use my GI Bill and go get myself one of those college deplomas. Was a Corona, ran the p!$$ out of it and it never broke. I've considered a Tundra from time to time but can't seem to strike a deal, sales dudes are too proud of them I guess. Besides, I've had good results with the GM twins going back to my 1975 Chev in-line six. Oh, btw, installed the Air Lift system you recommended a couple weeks ago. A really nice setup, especially with the wireless compressor. Haven't made a tow yet though, maybe I'll make a test run in a week or so. Cheers, hope we don't loose you as moderator if you jump ship to a Tundra :) !

Posted

Just fyi rdnckhntr94; you probably already know this. The current Tundra is basically on a 3/4 ton platform. So, when comparing to the competition it should be compared to their 3/4 ton models. I have only good things to say about the Toyota brand in general, especially their engines as they're pretty much bullet proof. Bought my first Toyota in 1969 when I decided to use my GI Bill and go get myself one of those college deplomas. Was a Corona, ran the p!$$ out of it and it never broke. I've considered a Tundra from time to time but can't seem to strike a deal, sales dudes are too proud of them I guess. Besides, I've had good results with the GM twins going back to my 1975 Chev in-line six. Oh, btw, installed the Air Lift system you recommended a couple weeks ago. A really nice setup, especially with the wireless compressor. Haven't made a tow yet though, maybe I'll make a test run in a week or so. Cheers, hope we don't loose you as moderator if you jump ship to a Tundra :) !

I know plenty of people with Toyota Tundras and various other Toyota vehicles, they all love them. My dad had an '87 Tacoma, or whatever they had back then, had the 22re motor and only issue was he went through a few clutches and the body rusted out. Sold it with 365k miles on the original motor. No doubt Toyota vehicles are solid, but the Tundra probably doesn't have the payload capacity that a GM/ Ford/ Ram HD truck has.

 

And a fellow moderator doesn't even have a GM truck currently, drives a Jeep, but he's been a moderator for so long it's no sense in dumping him because he drives something else

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

Well my 2016 Sierra has been at dealership since Friday. They are going to replace 3 tires that they couldn't road force balance. I really believe it's rearend related and so does service guy but GM says do tires first. And so begins the saga

Posted

A GM engineer looked over my truck today. Received a phone call from the dealership that my U-Joints need replacement and "Newly Engineered Steering Bushings". The parts are on order and will hopefully have them installed soon. Maybe GM has a fix for some customers coming out? Again my symptoms are noted mostly in the steering wheel from 70-80 MPH. I do have some shaking in the seat/console but it's no where near what some had discribed. I had the change in my console shake a few times but that was mostly cured by tires that were indeed out of balance. Hopefully any remaining vibration will be fixed. I'm estatic that I have been offered a solution other than wheels and tires. I do have some doubt, as most of us do after dealing with this issue, but I'm still hoping for the best. I'll post updates as they come.

Posted

A GM engineer looked over my truck today. Received a phone call from the dealership that my U-Joints need replacement and "Newly Engineered Steering Bushings". The parts are on order and will hopefully have them installed soon. Maybe GM has a fix for some customers coming out? Again my symptoms are noted mostly in the steering wheel from 70-80 MPH. I do have some shaking in the seat/console but it's no where near what some had discribed. I had the change in my console shake a few times but that was mostly cured by tires that were indeed out of balance. Hopefully any remaining vibration will be fixed. I'm estatic that I have been offered a solution other than wheels and tires. I do have some doubt, as most of us do after dealing with this issue, but I'm still hoping for the best. I'll post updates as they come.

 

When was the build date of you truck and what is your mileage? Im shocked your u-joints are already bad. Can you feel any play in them under the truck?

Posted

I think my build date is march of 2016. I have about 13k and change on the odometer. Bought the vehilcle as New with about 6,000 miles on it. Per the dealership the U-Joints were binding up in the same place on each rotation. I've had vibration issues since day one of purchase.

I think my build date is march of 2016. I have about 13k and change on the odometer. Bought the vehilcle as New with about 6,000 miles on it. Per the dealership the U-Joints were binding up in the same place on each rotation. I've had vibration issues since day one of purchase.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...