Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rolling tunder - the dealership told me they got no prints from road forced balancing because the machine can’t print results to a printer. So not sure how that works because an independent tire shop told me to ask dealership for printout of results as they said they had issues with Goodyear wranglers the very same one on GM trucks. Like tires were bad from manufacturer to start with. Who knows anymore what’s the cause but like others said GM knows but won’t admit to it. 

Posted

I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, particularly when it involves the manufacturer of my craptacular 1980 Pontiac that turned me off American cars for over 30 years.

 

That said, it's hard to be sure of how widespread defective driveshafts really are, given how many of these trucks are sold every year.  At these sales volumes it only takes a 0.1% defect rate to create a huge uproar in the forums.  And then there are the cases like mine, where a tire swap or other "quick fix" did in fact solve the problem.   GM was right to suggest it as a first line of attack.  

 

Anyway, I hope the more seriously afflicted owners do find a cure.   Big corporations are driven by economics, always seeking the cheapest possible way around a problem.   The trick is to make it unbearably expensive for them to ignore you.

Posted
4 hours ago, Barak said:

Rolling tunder - the dealership told me they got no prints from road forced balancing because the machine can’t print results to a printer. So not sure how that works because an independent tire shop told me to ask dealership for printout of results as they said they had issues with Goodyear wranglers the very same one on GM trucks. Like tires were bad from manufacturer to start with. Who knows anymore what’s the cause but like others said GM knows but won’t admit to it. 

Barak,

 

I made no reference to 'road force balancing,' my reference was to the PICO tester and its available printout.

 

Your experience with those Goodyear Wranglers is another example of what may solve one owner's issues and not anothers.  When I bought my truck I removed the 20" chrome wheels and installed the default 18" Z71 aluminum wheels with those Goodyear Wranglers.   I never had a vibration then and don't have one now and those wheels and tires carried us to Florida once and Alabama twice on the 70MPH+ Interstates.  I've seen many complaints about the Wrangler tires here but I never had any issues with them.

 

I've had the 18" wheels conventionally balanced independently by a private shop after the exchange, not a road force balance, and the factory balance left a lot to be desired.  I personally have no idea what causes the vibration on a small percentage of these GM trucks but it's a helluva thing to read about the problem on $50,000 +/- trucks and the understandable dissatisfaction of those owners.

Posted
22 hours ago, Barak said:

LoL what a process. Well interesting enough I have to say that I have not been noticing vibration at 72-75 speeds anymore. It’s strange but it’s no longer apparent like before. I did sort of feel it at higher speeds like 85-95 but that could be due to cross winds etc especially going that speed. However, the dealer should be reaching out back to me to work on service bulletins once they have PICO tool in thier hands. So we will see what that comes to. I do feel that a real shake/vibration is at driveshaft area. And it’s not uncommon for engineers to come out and enage. Hopefully by having engineers due this maybe GM will come out with a fix and recall. Let see what happens. Keep posting please. Thanks! 

I got a 2016 Suburban February and it doesn't vibrate until I hook up a trailer, shakes worse when towing on fresh blacktop then concrete, when I towed my tractor back from cabin in north WI a few weeks back it didn't shake. Your comment got me thinking, aluminum absorbs heat, and when it is hot there is less strength to it, could it be that blacktop is much hotter then concrete and we have much colder weather here now?  Hot driveshaft is weaker then a cold one?

Posted

Interesting perspective. I hope GM is reviewing and listening to these experiences we are all having. The driveshaft hot/cold makes lot of sense given weather conditions in certain parts of country unless it’s tires or any other suspension components which seem to be first things GM suggests to look into and rule stuff out. 

Posted

I’ve recently encountered this “infamous” shake or vibration but mine is more around 1250 rpm. Doesnt really matter the speed but it’s more when I’m speeding up staying at  1250 rpm it’s constant so I have to give it more gas to get out of the “shake”. Has GM solved any of these issues? Or given answers to what’s at fault?

Posted

Nope.  They are staying quiet about it and no matter what amount of noise the public makes, they seem to be able to muffle it.   They and other manufacturers will just ignore the issue or put it on the back burner and hope the new model doesn't have the same issue and focus on the new model instead of doing the right thing to make right the screwed up engineering somewhere for the many thousands of people who have the issues. 

Posted

You’ve got the torque converter slip. I have it on both my vehicles. I’ve had the flush, the valve spring replacement, new engine mounts, and they replaced the TC. Still an issue. My dealer said they are working on designing a new TC and will replace via recall. Don’t hold your breath. 

Posted

Text from the dealer today said - GM engineers recommended that we take the driveshaft to a shop to have it checked and balanced. 

 

Fingers crossed this actually could fix it 

Posted (edited)

The more I read the more I question my situation. I have a 18 Suburban, my first red flag was the excessive vibrations when at highest speed, too it in and the balance my tires problem seemed to be better. Next I went in for a headline issue and mentioned vibrations so they road force balance them and replaced one tire. Just drove 350 miles around 70-90mph and it felt like excessive bouncing like suspension was over working. I didn't feel like the whole car was shaking like my first time I noticed this issue. My experience is that 50+mph it feels like I'm driving in a cobblestone street. 

Does anyone know what GM "within specs" are for road force balance. I just had my 2018 Suburban road forced and the numbers they said seen higher than I recall my previous cars have had. They replaced one tire but I still have vibrations.

 

 

Edited by Dearmosd
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Dearmosd said:

Does anyone know what GM "within specs" are for road force balance. I just had my 2018 Suburban road forced and the numbers they said seen higher than I recall my previous cars have had. They replaced one tire but I still have vibrations.

My experience is that 50+mph it feels like I'm driving in a cobblestone street. 

 

 

Under 10LBS is what I was told by my service manager Dearmosd but GM calls for under 15. 

 

 

Edited by GMCJOE17
Posted

When I was a kid I worked in a gas station (50 years ago).  We sold, mounted, and balanced hundreds of tires on cars and trucks.  And through the years I've had lots of cars and trucks that I had tires replaced on after they wore out.  95% didn't have or cause any vibrations.  God bless those that are trying to solve the Chevy vibe issues, but generally it seems to go way deeper than just tires and or wheels.  GM engineers know what the problem is, or problems are, they just aren't letting the cat out'a the bag.

 

Class action might help but what I believe what we really need is for major news organizations (yeah, even the "fake news" folks) to be made aware of the issue and report it.  Make the problem known to the public at large, not just the unsuspecting suckers that buy these trucks.

Posted (edited)

I believe it's the cheap, hollow out of round aluminum driveshafts that are to blame for the shake. I've seen a few people that got steel, 2-piece driveshafts installed and the vibrations were gone.

Edited by ShubiSnax
Posted
2 hours ago, ShubiSnax said:

I believe it's the cheap hollow, out of round aluminum driveshafts that are to blame for the shake. I've seen a few people that got steel, 2-piece driveshafts installed and the vibrations were gone.

Agree, the angle of the shaft to the rear end is an issue plus the cheap Aluminum shaft with Cardboard core is another issue. Trying to balance the tires to PERFECTION may help the balance issue but it wont solve it. Anything GM can do to take the spotlight off the driveshafts and save money you know they are going to do. Imagine a recall on ALL the driveshafts from 2014-2018. 

Driveshaft2.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey guys, sorry for the confusison about this. This wasn't my experainnce, it was copied and pasted fom the net. 
    • The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...