Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been running 87 most of the time and 89 occasionally since I got the truck. I must say it's a relief to my wallet not having to use 93 all the time anymore. I have a 5.3, so regular is fine. I wish I could get my hands on 93 for $2.68 though, I would be all over that! It's around $3.40 here.

Posted

I posted earlier in the thread that I've been buying Shell 89 exclusively for a while now. However my wife and I just recently got a Sam's Club membership and I can get 93 from Sam's club for less than I get 89 from Shell. Only thing is Sam's gas isn't Top Tier. Any thoughts or recommendations?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I've used Sams Club fuels for years without a problem. Currently I don't use it but not because of quality problems. IMO, "Top Tier" status should be taken with a grain of salt.

Posted

91 on a 91 tune. That's the highest that is allowed here in the great state of Kalifornia. Along with all our other "protective & humane" laws.

Posted (edited)

I posted earlier in the thread that I've been buying Shell 89 exclusively for a while now. However my wife and I just recently got a Sam's Club membership and I can get 93 from Sam's club for less than I get 89 from Shell. Only thing is Sam's gas isn't Top Tier. Any thoughts or recommendations?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Try it and see if the truck changes in mileage or power feel.

 

I have filled up at 3 different stations: Co-op (Independent company,fuel is refined in Saskatchewan,Canada; regarded as top tier here), Petro-Canada (Suncor energy based filling station, Suncor is heavily involved in the oil sands in northern Alberta, also regarded as top tier), and Shell. I "seem" to have the best mileage with Shell fuel, and I tried driving in equivalent distances and conditions, still seemed to get an average of 1 mpg better than the other 2.

 

Shell also came out with a "better" 91 called v power nitro,see link. I have been to a few stations with it.

 

http://www.kcentv.com/story/29220198/new-shell-v-power-nitro-premium-gasoline-introduces-breakthrough-formulation-for-best-total-engine-protection

Edited by Jordan18
Posted (edited)

Just filled my truck up with 20 gallons of 93 octane from Shell for $2.84 per gallon.

Edited by crafferty
Posted

I run E85 when I can find it because I enjoy the extra power, and 93 when I can't - I have never run 89 but I do notice knock when running 87 and have even experienced a little knock w/ 91.

 

E85 is the shiznit

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I just finished running four consecutive tanks of Shell 93, and have been running Shell 87 since September 2013, prior. The gas mileage was no better. It cost me $8-$10 more to fill up, and I really could not feel any difference in performance.

 

I have had to use other brands of fuel on occasion, like when I took my trip out West last fall. The local Shell is getting a complete overhaul right now, new tanks and pumps. Last week I tried gas from Citgo, and my gas mileage went down. I filled up with AGO gas towards the end of last week, and already seeing an increase in gas mileage over the Citgo branded. I know some of the tanker trucks go from one brand station to the next, but apparently there must be a difference in these two brands.

 

I'm going to stick with the manufacturers rating of 87 octane and not worry about it. I haven't seen anything to convince me otherwise. If someone can get better gas mileage than I am getting on Shell 87, I'd love to see it.

 

As far as engine knock, I've never heard it, or pinging of any type. Of course the DI engine has its own special sound, so who knows for sure. I have a 5 year/100,000 mile Powertrain Warranty if there is a problem down the road. I know I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, but I am going to save the extra $10/week, $500+/year by buying regular 87 over premium 93.

Edited by Ventilator
  • 5 years later...
Posted

Pepper is a flex fuel vehicle but 87 E-10 most of the time unless I'm experimenting or storing. I've never run E-85 as in my area the price spread has never been large enough to offset the mileage loss. In fact it is rarely more than a quarter a gallon cheaper on two dollar fuel. I have filled in the winter with 90-91 E-0 to store. I'd use 87 E-0 if I could find it. Experimenting I used 93 E-10 for a few months. Other than the hole in my wallet I could tell not real difference. Still ran KR, albeit a bit less.

 

Note on winter fuel. Always a hot topic. Recently we had a full week of 70 F+ weather in my area. Guess what happened to my fuel economy on winter fuel? Yea...right back to summer economy numbers. It's isn't fuel kids. It's viscosity.  

Posted

I run 93 since it is a 6.2.   I will mix some E85 in it when I'm in that town that has it.  Love the exhaust smell running E85.   

 

On my 2002 when I had it I ran 93 since Blackbear tuned it.  I also talked to Jason of Blackbear and he said that these LS engines have a high compression and he is seeing that the computer is having to reduce timing a ton to reduce knock if it can when one runs 87.  He suggests to at least run 89 if you can even if it is stock.

Posted
7 hours ago, Wesivy said:

If I use 87, I seem to have a fuel smell in my oil when changing it. I use 89 with no issues, even when towing my 8000 lb camper.

Blow-by, everyone's oil smells like gasoline. I was worried too, even though it was the first time I did a sniff test on oil. Lol

Posted

I was also noticing when I first started the truck an opaque white smoke from the exhaust like it was burning rich with the 87. It just started that at 75,000 miles but doesn't do it with 89 or 93. 

Posted
23 hours ago, Wesivy said:

I was also noticing when I first started the truck an opaque white smoke from the exhaust like it was burning rich with the 87. It just started that at 75,000 miles but doesn't do it with 89 or 93. 

The only thing octane could impact is engine knock. There was a tsb when these trucks first came out addressing white or black smoke on start up. Odd that your noticing it at 75000 miles. 

 

Go with your gut. If you feel the truck isn't performing how it should be, I would bring it into a reliable dealer and see if they can diagnose your problems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...