Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Most dealerships will not help you with your problems with the leveling kit on it. It is on your dime to remove the leveling kit. You will also probably have to put the factory rims and tires back on. It has been covered in this thread multiple times that the leveling kit and bigger tires/ different rims are not the cause but it is what it is. You are asking GM to fix a problem to a vehicle that has had the oem parts replaced and/or modified and they have every right to not work on it till the truck is back to how it was when it left the factory.

I agree. Put it all back to stock or your out of luck. When I was going thru this issue I saw a lot of truck with mods like different tires on stock rims, different rims and tires, different shocks, leveling kits, anything different then factory they get turned away.

 

I know most of these truck shake but adding different mods just adds fuel to the fire.

Posted

"This is the needle bearing location right behind the axle flange."

 

I believe those are roller bearings. However, you'll probably find needle bearings inside your u-joint caps is you should accidentally knock one off. Done that a few times, a pain in the you know where to put them back in place and reinstall the cap. So, be careful :)

Posted

"This is the needle bearing location right behind the axle flange."

 

I believe those are roller bearings. However, you'll probably find needle bearings inside your u-joint caps is you should accidentally knock one off. Done that a few times, a pain in the you know where to put them back in place and reinstall the cap. So, be careful :)

I got the impression this was the FRONT differential, so he should not be dealing with U-Joints.

Also, if it is the front, then if a loose bearing is the cause of his problem, it isn't the fix for everyone because it would not explain the 2WD trucks that have the vibration.

Posted

I got the impression this was the FRONT differential, so he should not be dealing with U-Joints.

Also, if it is the front, then if a loose bearing is the cause of his problem, it isn't the fix for everyone because it would not explain the 2WD trucks that have the vibration.

The front driveshaft is exactly like the rear drive shaft just shorter, both have 2 u-joints
Posted (edited)

The front driveshaft is exactly like the rear drive shaft just shorter, both have 2 u-joints

Except he noted that the drivers side has play and the passenger side does not, which makes no sense unless he is talking about the shafts to the front wheels, in which case they would be the CV shafts not the driveshaft, and they would unbolt as a single integrated unit. Note the driveshaft hanging down behind the diff in the right side of the picture.

Edited by rpoffen
Posted (edited)

"This is the needle bearing location right behind the axle flange."

 

I believe those are roller bearings. However, you'll probably find needle bearings inside your u-joint caps is you should accidentally knock one off. Done that a few times, a pain in the you know where to put them back in place and reinstall the cap. So, be careful :)

I'm not talking about cv joint or drive lines. There's s needle / Torrington bearing (outside axle shaft bearing) looks like this. It's a type of needle bearing. this bearing uses the axle shaft as the dolling surface. 00d4a678ddef66fb40aa747fc14146fa.jpg

 

These. 0d0d2438d2428a77e49a4ee87dc1a991.png

 

Need to talk to the dealer to see what the proper timken part number is but pretty sure it's this one. 5442b9cd870359efe2cf0662788ab7e4.png

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by smcgillis10
Posted

I'm not talking about cv joint or drive lines. There's s needle / Torrington bearing (outside axle shaft bearing) looks like this. It's a type of needle bearing. this bearing uses the axle shaft as the dolling surface. 00d4a678ddef66fb40aa747fc14146fa.jpg

These. 0d0d2438d2428a77e49a4ee87dc1a991.png

Need to talk to the dealer to see what the proper timken part number is but pretty sure it's this one. 5442b9cd870359efe2cf0662788ab7e4.png

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, curiosity got the best of me. So, did a little googling on what's a needle bearing and what's a roller bearing. Your pics actually show good examples of each. Anyway, the below Wikipedia hot link gives a pretty good definition of each and when one becomes the other. To paraphrase Bill Clinton, "it depends on what the definition of is is". Nothing wrong having a teachable moment every now and then, right :) ?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Needle_roller_bearing

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So I had my 2016 AT with 20"s road force balanced after they had attempted 2 regular balances that just changed the vibration speed, but didn't eliminate it.

 

My truck was smooth to 72-74 most days, and aggressive vibration from 75 and up. Some days it was perfect to 74, and sometimes it was slight up to 74. It always shook at 75+

 

So before the road force balancing All, every single damn one was over 36-45 lbs of road force.

 

Seriously GM... You roll out your vehicles out like this?

 

After road force, 3 are 14-18 lbs and one was down to 22 lbs. They mounted the 22 lb one in the rear which eliminated the steering shake.

 

Now the the vibrations are 97% gone at speeds up to 72/73 and 99% gone at speeds of 75 and up.

 

I bought my wife a Yukon Denali XL this weekend, it it also shook ridiculously.

 

The dealership clearly admitted that it was the tires. The "service manager" stated that he's pretty sure that GM slaps tires on the rims with zero consideration or high to low spot alignment and in many cases, they place some sticky weights on the rims to give to appearance that the wheels have been balanced. But at no time do they truly balance thier wheels from the factory.

 

The dealership was forced to invest $66k in a new road force balancer because they rebalance "every single" wheels set on every car that come to the dealership.

 

The have a tech that just does this. They pay him $115 an hour to just road force balance wheels.

 

So we bought the truck on the basis that they would RFB, and if that didn't work out they'd replace the tires with new bridge stones, and if I'm not happy, they will replace them with Michelins.

 

The Yukon wheels were all 36 - 45 lbs of road force.

 

After RFB, three were 14-22 lbs, 1 was 28 lbs. He's ordering two new tires, one for the 22 lbs and one for the 28.

 

Even at this level, the Yukon 96% better. And should be resolved with the two new tires.

 

He said he's required to replace the factory tire first. If I'm not happy, he said he'd order me Michelins and went on to mention "wait til you see how this truck perform on Michelins that all RFB under 10 lbs."

 

So I'm confident that the issues here lies with 2 things:

 

1) GM using that crappie tires they can find.

 

2) And not giving three craps about balancing the tires from the factory.

 

Just my thoughts

Edited by SierraMyst
Posted

So I had my 2016 AT with 20"s road force balanced after they had attempted 2 regular balances that just changed the vibration speed, but didn't eliminate it.

 

My truck was smooth to 72-74 most days, and aggressive vibration from 75 and up. Some days it was perfect to 74, and sometimes it was slight up to 74. It always shook at 75+

 

So before the road force balancing All, every single damn one was over 36-45 lbs of road force.

 

Seriously GM... You roll out your vehicles out like this?

 

After road force, 3 are 14-18 lbs and one was down to 22 lbs. They mounted the 22 lb one in the rear which eliminated the steering shake.

 

Now the the vibrations are 97% gone at speeds up to 72/73 and 99% gone at speeds of 75 and up.

 

I bought my wife a Yukon Denali XL this weekend, it it also shook ridiculously.

 

The dealership clearly admitted that it was the tires. The "service manager" stated that he's pretty sure that GM slaps tires on the rims with zero consideration or high to low spot alignment and in many cases, they place some sticky weights on the rims to give to appearance that the wheels have been balanced. But at no time do they truly balance thier wheels from the factory.

 

The dealership was forced to invest $66k in a new road force balancer because they rebalance "every single" wheels set on every car that come to the dealership.

 

The have a tech that just does this. They pay him $115 an hour to just road force balance wheels.

 

So we bought the truck on the basis that they would RFB, and if that didn't work out they'd replace the tires with new bridge stones, and if I'm not happy, they will replace them with Michelins.

 

The Yukon wheels were all 36 - 45 lbs of road force.

 

After RFB, three were 14-22 lbs, 1 was 28 lbs. He's ordering two new tires, one for the 22 lbs and one for the 28.

 

Even at this level, the Yukon 96% better. And should be resolved with the two new tires.

 

He said he's required to replace the factory tire first. If I'm not happy, he said he'd order me Michelins and went on to mention "wait til you see how this truck perform on Michelins that all RFB under 10 lbs."

 

So I'm confident that the issues here lies with 2 things:

 

1) GM using that crappie tires they can find.

 

2) And not giving three craps about balancing the tires from the factory.

 

Just my thoughts

The numbers from the road force measurements are the variance in force between the lowest measurement and the highest measurement due to stiff spots in the sidewalls and high and low spots on the tire and wheel.. 25 lbs is the industry standard acceptable measurement for a truck or suv tire although it has been stated that numbers below 15 are required to eliminate the shaking on the new GM platforms. Something to be aware of though as you drive and the tires start to break in there is a good chance these numbers will change and may require the tires to be force matched onto the wheel again changing temperature will also have an affect. Hopefully everything stays smooth for you from here on out.

Posted

The numbers from the road force measurements are the variance in force between the lowest measurement and the highest measurement due to stiff spots in the sidewalls and high and low spots on the tire and wheel.. 25 lbs is the industry standard acceptable measurement for a truck or suv tire although it has been stated that numbers below 15 are required to eliminate the shaking on the new GM platforms. Something to be aware of though as you drive and the tires start to break in there is a good chance these numbers will change and may require the tires to be force matched onto the wheel again changing temperature will also have an affect. Hopefully everything stays smooth for you from here on out.

 

Another thing to do is to use an indelible marker to mark the sidewall on each tire where the valve stem is. In previous posts (somewhere back in the 629 pages), some posters had noted that the tire was slipping on the rim. If it does, then the RF balance is no good any longer.

This way, if you start to get the vibes back, you can easily see if the tire has moved.

  • Like 1
Posted

The dealership was forced to invest $66k in a new road force balancer because they rebalance "every single" wheels set on every car that come to the dealership.

 

The have a tech that just does this. They pay him $115 an hour to just road force balance wheels.

 

 

You buy this BS?

  • Like 1
Posted

You buy this BS?

Hard for me to believe the Service Manager isn't pissed that he has to rebalance the wheels on every single truck that comes on his lot because every single one shakes?

 

Point is that every service manager that cares about getting the cars right are also fed up with the vibration B.S.

 

Then there's service departments like my first dealer who tried to regular balance them twice and eventually gave me the "this is normal for a truck" b.s.

 

I saw the machine, it was pretty new, and he was aware of the fact that there's a vibration issue in just about every vehicle.

 

That takes balls to admit to a customer.

 

It's GM that doesn't want to admit it.

Posted

$115 an hour comes out to $239,200 a year, assuming 40 hours a week x 52 weeks. That may be what they are trying to charge back to GM but that isn't what they are paying their tech. If it is I'll give up my job as a communications engineer and learn to RFB tires lol

  • Like 2
Posted

$115 an hour comes out to $239,200 a year, assuming 40 hours a week x 52 weeks. That may be what they are trying to charge back to GM but that isn't what they are paying their tech. If it is I'll give up my job as a communications engineer and learn to RFB tires lol

 

Yeah, the dealer charge per hour is probably $115/hr, but they might pay the tech $20/hr and pocket the rest!

Posted

My 2014 Z71 4X4 has a noticeable vibration when braking at highway speeds. However, it doesn't seem to affect the braking performance. Also, it does not pulse as would be felt when rotar is warped. There is no vibration when braking at normal in town driving speeds. Braking is smooth and normal. Truck has 51K miles.

 

Any ideas?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I've been eyeing an upgrade to my tonneau cover for a bit now.  Intrigued by the BAK MX4 EZ-Lift with the torsion spring and went for the upgrade.  Thoughts and musings during unpacking, install and a few days of usage.   Once my order went into Realtruck, it took about 4 days to ship.  Unfortunately, FedEx Ground destroyed the box and contents and it was unusable upon receipt.  To Realtruck's credit, one email with pictures and an RMA was sent to me to send the first one back, and another unit was shipped out.  It arrived 3 days later, unscathed.   I opened the box and it looked like every other BAK MX4.   Biggest differences are the rails and retaining clamps, and of course the spring attached to the cover itself.     NOTE - if you are upgrading from a MX4 to the EZ-Lift, you will have to replace the rails.  The EZ-Lift rails have a notch cut in them to allow the new style retaining clamps to fit properly.  The new retaining clamps also have 2 knobs/carriage bolts and there are two tracks underneath the front panel. The strap clips are mildly different (more like the Undercover Flex clamps) in that the screws go in from the underside.  Personally I prefer these over the BAK clamps that use the nutserts that are a nuisance to install.  The remainder of the parts in the box (drain tubes, rail clamps, and bumper pads) are standard issue BAK.     I did not replace my front bed seal at the time because it seemed to be in decent shape.   BAK recommends shims on the GM trucks unless you place the clamps on the flanges about 1/3 of the way in from both the front and rear of the bed.  I shimmed the front and the middle, and initially placed the clamps equidistant.  This also turned out to be a mistake, because when I set the cover in place, the new style retaining clamps wouldn't clear the front clamp.   New style clamp inserted in the track:     And the issue which occurred because the front rail clamp was too far forward:     Once I removed the shim from the front of the bed, and slid the clamp back to the front flange, everything cleared fine.     The cover set on the rails without issue and I installed the strap clamps.  After I completed my adjustments, I pulled the pin to activate the torsion spring.  Mistake #3 on my part.  PULL THE PIN AS THE VERY VERY VERY LAST STEP!  The reason is, once you pull the pin, the torsion spring is activated.  If you have to loosen the front clamps and adjust the cover, the front panel will - by virtue of the spring, refuse to lay down.  The only way to get it to lay down so you can reinstall and tighten the clamps is to fully open the panel against the back of the cab, which will then allow the front panel of the cover to lay down and be tightened.  Not a big deal unless you haven't installed the foam pads yet (typically the last step) because minus the foam pads, you will need to place something between the frame of the cover and the back window so it doesn't get scratched.  The next time I install one I will install the foam pads before I pull the pin and activate the spring.   After using it for a few days:   The spring assist is great.  You literally can open it with one hand.  My shoulders aren't getting any younger and this was part of my motivation to swap out. The second panel latches and unlatches itself as you open and close the cover.  Neat in concept, however it took me a minute to get used to closing the cover and not hearing the "latching" sound that would tell me it was locked in place. The paddle handles are a huge upgrade and I wouldn't be surprised to see them become the standard across the Realtruck line.  They effectively eliminate the concern that a thief could coat hanger the cover open and get to the contents in the bed. I'm not sure why the very front panel on my cover has a different finish from the other 3 panels.  I have a request into Realtruck to find out if mine was not manufactured properly or if it was by design.   All in all I'm pleased.  Same level of protection, looks good, keeps stuff mostly dry (they all leak around the tailgate) and easy to install.
    • Same here, first I bought a few filters to get me going right after I bought my truck to do some short distance initial oil changes, then realized I could buy a case lot for less as they drop the price if filters or trans oil etc is bought by the un opened case lot as well as the discount for buying the vehicle there. So I have filters for a while but its good to know going forward, knowing to expect it to be a different part number and looking filter at the dealer and not be confused over it and think they are handing me the wrong part.
    • Saw Inglewood was in the National New last night for hail. Allot of hail. front end loader level hail. 😱
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...