Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The reason why people don't tune their own vehicles is because the software costs an arm and a leg.

What do you consider an arm and a leg?

 

Diablo Canned Tune VS. HPtuners Custom tune software

Diablo tuner $400 (I consider this a higher end canned tune)

Pros-

load it and go -

great for the person not wanting to get to involved

 

Cons-

Very limited in tunability (is that a word)

Tune 1 vehicle

 

 

HPTuners Standard- $500

Pros-

squeeze every single bit of available power out of your car

Tune 4 vehicles

Tune more cars for $100 each

Customize tune for you mods at no additional charge.

Scan every available sensor or PID in you vehicle using charts, graphs, histogram, bit status and digital values, gauges.

 

Cons-

must be patient and have the time to lean how your car and it's ECU actually work together.

Very indepth with a heavy learning curve for most

Edited by iCryWheniGoPoop
  • Like 1
Posted

 

Cons-

must be patient and have the time to lean how your car and it's ECU actually work together.

Very indepth with a heavy learning curve for most

 

 

Ur right, its not that expensive, but the learning curve is pretty big like you stated. Plus the potential to really foul up a motor if you don't invest the time to learn the tuning capabilities.

 

 

And I didn't really consider Diablo a real "tune it yourself" option. IF you are gonna dive deep into custom tunes, it's gotta be with HP Tuners. Diablo is good for a canned tune which some people like, but you said it, limited tune-ability.

Posted

 

 

Ur right, its not that expensive, but the learning curve is pretty big like you stated. Plus the potential to really foul up a motor if you don't invest the time to learn the tuning capabilities.

 

 

And I didn't really consider Diablo a real "tune it yourself" option. IF you are gonna dive deep into custom tunes, it's gotta be with HP Tuners. Diablo is good for a canned tune which some people like, but you said it, limited tune-ability.

 

I was using Diablo as a Tune-in-a-can comparison. its only $100 cheaper and doesn't hold a candle to EFI-Live or HPTuners ability to custom tune. I will clarify my previous post.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I was using Diablo as a Tune-in-a-can comparison. its only $100 cheaper and doesn't hold a candle to EFI-Live or HPTuners ability to custom tune. I will clarify my previous post.

 

Roger that. I was picking up ur drift.

Posted

I've tried searching this topic but no real direct answer. I have read on this forum and others that the 5.3 tune includes both an 87 and E-85 tune. To trigger the E-85 tune requires increasing the alcohol content to a point where the computer senses the change. There have also been comments that all of the E-92 ECMs will naturally advance timing if you continue to use 91+ octane fuel. Couple of questions: Is it true that the E-92 implementation for the 5.3 will function this way? If true is the horsepower gain similar to what people are seeing when they use a custom tune? Thanks in advance.

Posted

I would think so but do realize that the biggest gain from a tune isn't horsepower/torque, it's the truck not driving like a dieing slug.

Posted (edited)

I've tried searching this topic but no real direct answer. I have read on this forum and others that the 5.3 tune includes both an 87 and E-85 tune. To trigger the E-85 tune requires increasing the alcohol content to a point where the computer senses the change. There have also been comments that all of the E-92 ECMs will naturally advance timing if you continue to use 91+ octane fuel. Couple of questions: Is it true that the E-92 implementation for the 5.3 will function this way? If true is the horsepower gain similar to what people are seeing when they use a custom tune? Thanks in advance.

 

The Calibration actually adjusts timing and AFR's thoughout the alcohol content % range and will start making corrections with as little as 6.5% alcohol content. Although the adjustment is slow, it's not as slow as people report. I can swap from E0% to E85% and the calibration will be fully adjusted within 50 to 100 miles. You have heard correct on the power increase as well, you are effectivly gaining well over 10 points octane and in the calibration there is an alcohol content timing modifier that is based off of alcohol percent and seems to be set very conservatively. I am currently working on a max power E85 tune on mine just to see what is possible in these new 5.3's. I believe there have been several dyno pulls to support the increase in power of E85 over pure gasoline. Here is a good link to Lingenfelters Forum from when they did base line numbers before there supercharger build and very impressive if you ask me. http://www.lingenfelter.com/LPEforumfiles/showthread.php?2248-2014-1500-Silverado-with-5-3L-L83-engine-work-begins

 

As far as the E92 advancing timing for continued use of 91 octane or better, this is false. The calibration has no way of knowing what octane is in the vehicle. After working with mine for almost 2 weeks now, I can verify that the factory part throttle timing tables are very aggressive for this engine and show a more than average amount of knock on 87 octane causing the truck to pull timing. When running 91, there was little if any knock which did transfer to 1-2 MPG increase and although there are no numbers to support it, seemed to help HP/TQ as well. In a way... you heard correct, but its not so much as a gain for 91 octane, but more of a loss for running 87.

Edited by iCryWheniGoPoop
  • Like 1
Posted

Does it automatically adjust based on octane alone too? Sent from my LG-G2

No... I modified the previous post to add this information.

Posted (edited)

Thanks for your time... Now I don't have an excuse not to get a tune... Should be fun with a 3.73

 

Sent from my LG-G2

 

Edited by calgator73
Posted

Well... all 2014 owners have an excuse not to get a tune since we are all gambling with our warranty and the odds are heavily against us. :shakehead:

Posted (edited)

Maybe I've not searched the right places but I can't seem to find anything online where a Silverado/Sierra truck with a street tune has blown their engine or tranny. Not saying that it won't or hasn't happened but I would imagine the odds would be low. Now I'm not talking about guys who have turbos/superchargers or aftermarket cams. Since these engines gain almost 30 HP and 30+ lb ft of torque with E85 I don't see where a custom street tune will stress these engines much. It seems that people are getting roughly 40 more HP with custom tunes with only bolt-ons.

 

Putting E85 in the 2014 5.3 has shown better results than any stret ecu/tcu tune for 93 octane so far for me. What I plan to do , is leave a street 87 octane tune in with good tcu tune and then go BIG on the E85 fuel tune. It is nice that GM gave us a nice starter race tune for E85.. :)

Edited by 8thsense
Posted

 

Putting E85 in the 2014 5.3 has shown better results than any stret ecu/tcu tune for 93 octane so far for me. What I plan to do , is leave a street 87 octane tune in with good tcu tune and then go BIG on the E85 fuel tune. It is nice that GM gave us a nice starter race tune for E85.. :)

 

This is exactly what I am doing... I have finished up what seems to be a pretty strong 87 tune (Dyno results will follow as time permits) and now I am raping the timing on the E85 side. I think I'm going to have to put it on a Dyno to make some real gains because I'm going to end up in jail if I keep tuning on the street.

Posted

I've been searching, but haven't seen much talk about programmers on the 2014's....is this cause of warranty issues or what? I saw a few guys mention getting custom tunes, but I was actually just going to get the Hypertech speedometer calibrator for new larger tires, but for another $100 its almost a no brainer to get a programmer even though I'm not really looking to go changing anything crazy. Anybody out there have experience with any of these?

Posted

There is plenty of discussion on this. Yes you will have warranty issues even if you just do a speed calibration. GM just shows something is changed, they do not show if its for speed calibration or if its a complete tune.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...