Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Ordered 2021 crew cab standard bed satin steel metallic  trailboss  with leather package convenience 2 and bed protection package with the 5.3 liter on 10/23 ..just found out this week the target production week is 12/7  and gm code 3400 thinking January before I see it.  Located in upstate ny 

 

12/8 update.  Vehicle produced they provided me with full vin on Chevy chat.  truck  in quality control in yard awaiting shipping no estimate on shipping date yet 

Edited by Maxmack1
Update
Posted (edited)

Seems to have taken longer for them to get started on my AT4 Carbon Pro. It may be due to using an independent dealer/broker rather than a GM dealer. Ordered on 9/28 (not sure when it was picked up). Build week of 11/23. Still waiting to hear from the dealer if  they have an update. If it ships next week, I am hoping on a Phoenix delivery before Christmas. That would be a total of about 12 weeks.

 

Update 12/2/2020... Dealer informs me that the truck is being delayed due to a shortage of suspension parts.

Edited by Heinzy
Added update from 12/2/2020
Posted

Ordered my 21 SLT CCSB 5.3 10sp on 10/7. Picked it up today. Came from Ft Wayne. Just under 60 days from order to delivery.

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Posted
On 11/26/2020 at 4:36 PM, bstraty said:

I called today for an update and was told that it is currently in shipping and they expect it at the dealership within the next couple weeks.  Just in time for Christmas.

They confirmed that the spray in bed-liners are on constraint so they're apparently just getting them without the spray ins.  I'm glad I got the carbon pro!

I was updated yesterday. 
 

My truck is in and at the dealership! They did PDI and dealer installed items. Now it’s gone for protective film and ceramic coat. 
I’m pretty surprised with how quick it ended up being. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Congrats bstraty! I'm on day 5 with my new Sierra and love it. Best of luck to you!

Posted

Just called my dealer and my truck still isn't accepted by GM, he said the Max Tow is now open but the gas engines aren't, 6 weeks now I'm starting to think this might not happen!

Posted

Just chatted the other day with gmc and they said my order was accepted but no more information.  Ordered a AT4 6.2L with a standard box and other goodies.  Put the order in about 4 weeks ago.  

Posted

I ordered my 2021 Sierra AT4 crew cab standard bed on 10/8/20. Truck was built 11/10 at Silao. Since then, its been at status 4000/4B00 and hasn't moved. I'm in North Carolina. I'm wondering that takes so long to get this thing on a train and on it's way to me. For how many trucks they produce every day, it makes no sense why they'd hold on to one for so long after production. I've tried asking my dealer but they've been no more helpful than the GMC chat people. Dealer originally said 6 weeks, its now been 9 weeks and no end in sight. I was really hoping to take delivery by Christmas with all these great year end incentives, but with a 2 week ship time, there's no way I'll see it before year end. ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinnie Cura said:

I ordered my 2021 Sierra AT4 crew cab standard bed on 10/8/20. Truck was built 11/10 at Silao. Since then, its been at status 4000/4B00 and hasn't moved. I'm in North Carolina. I'm wondering that takes so long to get this thing on a train and on it's way to me. For how many trucks they produce every day, it makes no sense why they'd hold on to one for so long after production. I've tried asking my dealer but they've been no more helpful than the GMC chat people. Dealer originally said 6 weeks, its now been 9 weeks and no end in sight. I was really hoping to take delivery by Christmas with all these great year end incentives, but with a 2 week ship time, there's no way I'll see it before year end. ?

I was hoping to get mine by the end of the year as well but there is no way for menow after a 10/28 order date. One thing my dealer did say is if you get the VIN number before 12/31 he could finish the deal and get the end of the yr incentives and then you can take delivery of the truck when it finally arrives.

Posted
On 12/9/2020 at 9:53 AM, CMillSilverado said:

I was hoping to get mine by the end of the year as well but there is no way for menow after a 10/28 order date. One thing my dealer did say is if you get the VIN number before 12/31 he could finish the deal and get the end of the yr incentives and then you can take delivery of the truck when it finally arrives.

That's a good idea, but if you're trading, you'll be without a vehicle until your truck comes in. I'm still crossing my fingers that they get it on a train this week. That's my only chance of it getting here before Christmas ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinnie Cura said:

That's a good idea, but if you're trading, you'll be without a vehicle until your truck comes in. I'm still crossing my fingers that they get it on a train this week. That's my only chance of it getting here before Christmas ?

Actually he said I could drive my current trade until the new truck came in.

Posted
Actually he said I could drive my current trade until the new truck came in.
That's how it was for me while I waited on my truck. The contract isn't fully executed until you take delivery of your new truck, therefore you're entitled to your trade in until then.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Heard from my dealer that my truck was built last week (w/o 11/30). Not sure if when it will ship but still hoping on a delivery to Phoenix this year. I would think that a market as large as Phoenix would have frequent deliveries. Hoping for the December incentives. I would guess it’s up to the dealer to write the contract for December with a later ‘actual’ delivery date.

Posted

Anyone else having shipping issues? my '21 AT4 (standard bed, 6.2, cardinal red) was ordered 10/8, built 11/10, and now still sitting in mexico. Neither my dealer nor GM have any idea when it will ship. Talk about frustrating!

Posted
9 hours ago, Vinnie Cura said:

Anyone else having shipping issues? my '21 AT4 (standard bed, 6.2, cardinal red) was ordered 10/8, built 11/10, and now still sitting in mexico. Neither my dealer nor GM have any idea when it will ship. Talk about frustrating!

At least yours is built!  Mine has been ordered since then but no build date yet. Same as your truck just the color is white. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...