Jump to content

RECALL - Fire Risk


divicevich

Recommended Posts

Posted

Maybe GM should do what the tessler guy did.. recall is to harsh of a word.. its a program upgrade :dunno:

It certainly would be easier. They just download the updates to the Tesla cars via wifi so no need to take them to the dealer.

  • Replies 292
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

It certainly would be easier. They just download the updates to the Tesla cars via wifi so no need to take them to the dealer.

This would be nice, until a botched download bricks your ecm.

 

I got my recall done on Friday. Just took a few minutes. No big deal.

Posted

BECAUSE AS AN AMERICAN CONSUMER I AM SICK AND TIRED OF ***ALL*** MANUFACTURERS PRODUCING OVERPRICED JUNK!!

 

I demand ethics & honesty return to manufacturing. This goes for everything from dishwashers to pickups! We're getting SCREWED, and people just sit back and take it like good little sheep.

 

I will happily call out and ridicule ANY manufacturer that sends out a $40k + vehicle with failures like this! How many Model T's caught fire in 1914? In 100 years of manufacturing, you mean we STILL haven't learned to produce a QUALITY product??? It's 2014!! People carry hand held computers for God's sake!

 

There is NO excuse for this. NONE. If you think this is acceptable, then God help you.

How many Model Ts had to meet EPA requirements while trying to meet the demands and modifications of the gadget minded public? If you are comparing a Model T to a current model year vehicle then God help you. The Model T known to leak, break down, catch fire, and had floor boards constructed of wood couldn't traverse a muddy street without getting stuck in most instances. The 2014 Chevrolet Silverado on the other hand can handle most weather conditions, will protect you in most accidents, and does not require you to carry water to complete your journey.

Software is going to have bugs, parameters in software WILL need adjustments once in the field. That handheld computer you are carrying in your hand is on what version of it's operating system since its release. You cell phone carrier updates periodically and usually without notice to keep its equipment running in the field. Even that handheld computer you are carrying is guilty of fires from its own battery.

I myself being an IT person think nothing of this, if it were say a tie rod failing due to being engineered cheaply now I could see the argument but to cry about a software parameter update is not either understanding the recall or just not knowing all that is involved with keeping your environment clean.

Posted

This would be nice, until a botched download bricks your ecm.

 

I got my recall done on Friday. Just took a few minutes. No big deal.

this is coming to all vehicles I believe - on bricking the modules I believe they will be like most modern devices if the checksum does not pass then I believe it will resort back to the original parameters until a clean upgrade will complete.

Posted

How many Model Ts had to meet EPA requirements while trying to meet the demands and modifications of the gadget minded public? If you are comparing a Model T to a current model year vehicle then God help you. The Model T known to leak, break down, catch fire, and had floor boards constructed of wood couldn't traverse a muddy street without getting stuck in most instances. The 2014 Chevrolet Silverado on the other hand can handle most weather conditions, will protect you in most accidents, and does not require you to carry water to complete your journey.

Software is going to have bugs, parameters in software WILL need adjustments once in the field. That handheld computer you are carrying in your hand is on what version of it's operating system since its release. You cell phone carrier updates periodically and usually without notice to keep its equipment running in the field. Even that handheld computer you are carrying is guilty of fires from its own battery.

I myself being an IT person think nothing of this, if it were say a tie rod failing due to being engineered cheaply now I could see the argument but to cry about a software parameter update is not either understanding the recall or just not knowing all that is involved with keeping your environment clean.

Well then, maybe THE GOVERNMENT should keep their damn noses OUT of engineers business, and let the FREE MARKET dictate how complex vehicles get?

 

AH, but then what will you sheep do without having your hand held by "daddy gov't" at every turn. Don't buy the 'eco" crap - it's the biggest scam going. A big power grab - but, believe what you want - it's your money.

 

If the people who designed the truck CANNOT FIGURE OUT a problem BEFORE it is launched to the public, then maybe the vehicle is GETTING TOO COMPLEX!!! HELLO!!

 

I'll take a leaky, rattly, sputtering Model T any day over anything Detroit puts out these days. Really says something about manufacturers when their city's government can't even keep it together (BANKRUPT!). Birds of a feather ........

Posted

Well then, maybe THE GOVERNMENT should keep their damn noses OUT of engineers business, and let the FREE MARKET dictate how complex vehicles get?

 

AH, but then what will you sheep do without having your hand held by "daddy gov't" at every turn. Don't buy the 'eco" crap - it's the biggest scam going. A big power grab - but, believe what you want - it's your money.

 

If the people who designed the truck CANNOT FIGURE OUT a problem BEFORE it is launched to the public, then maybe the vehicle is GETTING TOO COMPLEX!!! HELLO!!

 

I'll take a leaky, rattly, sputtering Model T any day over anything Detroit puts out these days. Really says something about manufacturers when their city's government can't even keep it together (BANKRUPT!). Birds of a feather ........

Just exactly where do you suggest I buy a vehicle that is not built to modern standards the EPA sets? Your 07 has software running it. The only difference between your engine and mine is port vs direct injection and a few other mechanical additions

Posted

I agree that the feds need to back off but please explain how Chrysler, headquartered in Auburn Hills and Ford, headquartered in Dearborn have anything to do with Detroit being run by fools. Even with GM being headquartered there- It's a corporate headquarters, filled with white collar workers who live in the suburbs, not Detroit. Detroit's problems are traced back to the kind of person the citizens there kept putting in the mayors office.

Posted

Just

exactly where do you suggest I buy a vehicle that is not built to

modern standards the EPA sets? Your 07 has software running it. The only

difference between your engine and mine is port vs direct injection and

a few other mechanical additions

 

 

That's exactly my point - the government SHOULD get it's nose OUT of the automotive industry ....... but with the state of affairs we have today, it'll never happen in a million years.

 

SO, to that end, I will NOT by another vehicle that has any electronics in it. My choice. I want SIMPLICITY AND RELIABILITY. I'll build my own vehicle based on a pre-'73 platform and brand of my choice when the time comes.

 

 

 

Posted

Mike, wasn't talking about Ford or Chrysler in this instance ....

Posted

That's exactly my point - the government SHOULD get it's nose OUT of the automotive industry ....... but with the state of affairs we have today, it'll never happen in a million years.

 

SO, to that end, I will NOT by another vehicle that has any electronics in it. My choice. I want SIMPLICITY AND RELIABILITY. I'll build my own vehicle based on a pre-'73 platform and brand of my choice when the time comes.

 

 

 

 

That's reasonable. I for one believe the government should not stick their noses into private business. That would include healthcare and bailing out non-performing businesses. I like GM, but it is getting increasingly difficult to support them, well all auto manufacturers for that matter. I want a V-8 truck, crew cab built in the US with as much US parts as possible. Pretty weird that the Tundra is high up on the list.

A lot of people on various truck forums call consumers that purchase 1/2 ton trucks, 'grocery getters'. I wonder what % of consumers that purchase a 1/2 ton truck actually tow with it? I would guess that a high % of people buying these trucks today do not use a truck as a truck. That is ok, buy what you like. I believe that all truck manufacturers are trying to get the best gas mileage out of their vehicles as possible, through better technology and lighter materials. It is being driven by government and by the consumer actually buying that vehicle. Whether it GM, Ford, Ram they all tout their gas mileage statistics on their commercials. It is a big factor when one buys a new vehicle in this day and age. Just wait til a major hurricane hits the Southeast and shuts refineries down and gas does go to $5-$6 per gallon. It will be important then to have a vehicle that gets decent mileage. Certainly if one needs a truck to do real work, then there are many options in the 3/4 - 1 ton variety.

Posted

Yeah, sad times we live in.

 

I believe that had the government never been involved, the market would have eventually come up with something better many years ago, if that's what people wanted. If they got sick of 10mpg, and someone produced a truck that got 15, then everyone would flock to the 15, forcing the manufacturer to match or better 15. That's how the free market is SUPPOSED to work,, but sadly we haven't had a truly free market in quite some time ...

 

Take a big block V8, carbed and HEI, install peanut heads, 700r4 with Gear Vendors splitter bolted to the back, and I'll have more torque than my 5.3, AND BETTER mileage. Ive seen guys with that setup in a 70's 3/4 ton 4x4 getting 20 mpg on the highway. That's my kind of truck. If I had used my head back in '07, that's what I'd be driving.

Posted

Had my recall done friday on the GMC SLT Crew 5.3, also did the fuel pressure regulator one, the other two were done previously, maybe its just me but seems to idle a bit rougher as in dropped cylinders, and seems to stay in v8 vs v4 mode longer or easier. Could be my lead foot coming into play. Nothing else noticeable and not a big enough change to warrant concern, mileage seems about the same as I was getting before, roughly 18 the way I drive.

Concerned about amount of recalls and some such stuff? Had a 2012 Wrangler previously if you want spectacular fires look at theirs. Dont expect perfection, do expect problems identified to be fixed asap, aside from seat stick slip thing I believe they have done so and will continue to. really liked the jeep but to many problems kept cropping up reguiring loaners, like this even better so far no loaners and much better creature comfort.


Posted
Yup, looks like my "avoid first run model years" rule pays off again.

Yeah i know

 

Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

While I agree with most of the previous topics regarding gov't envlovement, the "Model T' comparison, and even "eco-crap", let's not forget that when you buy ANY North American built vehicle, I believe the majority of your hard earned dollar is kept here, at home. And those that insist on buying off shore with the thought the quality is better, I don't believe that.

We have a service writer friend who used to work for a BMW dealership and she was busier with defect work orders than regular maintenance requests.

Now that people spend money on vehicles from Germany, Japan and even Korea, we in North America have paid the price. And our children will really pay the price in the future.

Our North American vehicles are just as good as any thing off shore, if not better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...