Jump to content

The official ordering, production & delivery thread - 2019 Silverado / Sierra

Zane
 Share

Recommended Posts

04GMshorty Enthusiast

04GMshorty

Posted
Posted
On 1/21/2021 at 10:21 AM, Palytoxin said:

I ordered mine on 1/16/21.

 

2021 Sierra 1500

Crew Cab, Short Box

AT4 Trim

Satin Steel Metallic

6.2L

AT4 Preferred Package

Driver Alert Package 1

20" Wheel Option

Power Sunroof

 

Was told 12 + weeks. Now to just hurry up and wait.

 

 

That's pretty much what I ordered and I'm at like 19-20 weeks now.. I've lost count.. Still no word

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Null99
Null99

Built 10/16 brought it home 10/24. 

lt1z
lt1z

Picked up my Double Cab AT4 today. Really pleased with how my order came out. I picked the right trim, options and color.

BeardBros
BeardBros

Brought it home today!   TIMELINE FROM ORDER TO DELIVERY 10/29/18 - Ordered the all new T1 2019 Silverado High Country, Crew Cab Short Box, 6.2L with 10 speed trans., Tech Package, N

Posted Images

ram1067 Enthusiast

ram1067

Posted
Posted
On 1/25/2021 at 2:13 PM, Mercracing said:


I just go to the GMC webpage and a little icon pops up towards the lower right asking if I want to chat. I used that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What info did you need to check on build status? Thanks 

Mercracing Enthusiast

Mercracing

Posted
Posted
What info did you need to check on build status? Thanks 

Read up a little, asked and answered.

You need your order number.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ram1067 Enthusiast

ram1067

Posted
Posted

Good news my RST CC is “in transit” and should hit the lot by February 1st! Ordered in December! So keep the faith GM is cranking these units out! 

nekit Enthusiast

nekit

Posted
Posted

So here's a weird one.  We ordered 5 trucks for work through Enterprise.  Placed order with GM Dec 1.  Got a notice last week that they cancelled 1 of the trucks, mine.  Enterprise says GM took too many orders and are cancelling some. If I want a GM I would have to wait till 2022 orders.  Crazy cancelling paying customers, but I guess they have enough orders to keep them busy till July.  Guess I'll get a Ram.

AtomicYJ Enthusiast

AtomicYJ

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, nekit said:

So here's a weird one.  We ordered 5 trucks for work through Enterprise.  Placed order with GM Dec 1.  Got a notice last week that they cancelled 1 of the trucks, mine.  Enterprise says GM took too many orders and are cancelling some. If I want a GM I would have to wait till 2022 orders.  Crazy cancelling paying customers, but I guess they have enough orders to keep them busy till July.  Guess I'll get a Ram.

I ordered a 6.2 CCSB LT Trail Boss today. Dealer said 3-4 month wait most likely. He also told me GM stopped all fleet orders of 2021s. Maybe that’s why yours got canceled? With 5 trucks would it be a fleet sale?

nekit Enthusiast

nekit

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, AtomicYJ said:

I ordered a 6.2 CCSB LT Trail Boss today. Dealer said 3-4 month wait most likely. He also told me GM stopped all fleet orders of 2021s. Maybe that’s why yours got canceled? With 5 trucks would it be a fleet sale?

Yep.  It's a fleet sale through Enterprise.  I just thought it was odd they have so many orders they are turning away paying customers.  Hopefully it helps you get your quicker.

 

Steve-2019 Enthusiast

Steve-2019

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, AtomicYJ said:

I ordered a 6.2 CCSB LT Trail Boss today. Dealer said 3-4 month wait most likely. He also told me GM stopped all fleet orders of 2021s. Maybe that’s why yours got canceled? With 5 trucks would it be a fleet sale?

Did your dealer say why your order will take a 3-4 month wait and why fleet sales were stopped?

AtomicYJ Enthusiast

AtomicYJ

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Steve-2019 said:

Did your dealer say why your order will take a 3-4 month wait and why fleet sales were stopped?

He speculated GM is going to start producing 2022s early. He also said something along the lines of things at GM are bannanas right now. I wanted the advanced trailering package, but its no longer available on the LT TB. He also thinks it won’t come back until the 2022s drop.

 

Nekit, I would understand no longer accepting fleet orders, but cancelling one seems dumb.

JTV New Member

JTV

Posted
Posted

Ordered an AT4 in late October...apparently the Denali's & AT4's are down to a 30% production rate as they are only getting a small amount of spray-in bedliner paint.  Mine is sitting in an 1100 status...so still no build date assigned.

nekit Enthusiast

nekit

Posted
Posted
On 1/29/2021 at 5:30 PM, nekit said:

So here's a weird one.  We ordered 5 trucks for work through Enterprise.  Placed order with GM Dec 1.  Got a notice last week that they cancelled 1 of the trucks, mine.  Enterprise says GM took too many orders and are cancelling some. If I want a GM I would have to wait till 2022 orders.  Crazy cancelling paying customers, but I guess they have enough orders to keep them busy till July.  Guess I'll get a Ram.

GM must really be hurting to get these trucks built.  They just cancelled 2 more of the 5 fleet trucks we had ordered in December.  We had signed purchase agreements, so by all intensive purposes these were sold vehicles for them.  Of these trucks we had 4, 6 and 8 cylinder engines, so not an engine issue.  Dual cab and Crew cab.

nekit Enthusiast

nekit

Posted
Posted

They were all WT, so I would guess that they are figuring they will make more money building the higher trims and can only build so many.

 

Fubar12 Enthusiast

Fubar12

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ordered my truck dec 17th 

Custom trailboss 6.2 midnight still no eta 

Chevy chat says 

been accepted into the system but hasn't been assigned a target production week yet.

Edited by Fubar12
rickmc17 Enthusiast

rickmc17

Posted
Posted

 Must be something to do with the 6.2L. I ordered a 3.0L AT4 on the same day. It’s In transit to dealership with 2/10 eta as of GMC Chat this morning. It sucks they leave you in limbo. I was very lucky. 

AtomicYJ Enthusiast

AtomicYJ

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, nekit said:

GM must really be hurting to get these trucks built.  They just cancelled 2 more of the 5 fleet trucks we had ordered in December.  We had signed purchase agreements, so by all intensive purposes these were sold vehicles for them.  Of these trucks we had 4, 6 and 8 cylinder engines, so not an engine issue.  Dual cab and Crew cab.

 

4 hours ago, nekit said:

They were all WT, so I would guess that they are figuring they will make more money building the higher trims and can only build so many.

 

That's just crazy to me that they'd cancel basically sold vehicles. They must make a killing on the higher trim trucks. Did they cancel any crewcab trucks? I've seen people post in the 2020 HD forum that they're only building CC HD trucks at the moment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...