Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes. Do you know how efi live people get the software to the point they can release it to the public? They get the ability from beta testers like the guy tuning my truck. Hes done hundreds of GMCs like mine. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Mileguru said:

??? You know the results before the tune is even done ???

And to be clear, you're claiming that your friend is going to tune your T87A using an Auto Cal (EFI Live) WITHOUT unlocking the TCM? And WITHOUT swapping the 2017 TCM with an earlier 2014-2016 TCM? 

I ran this by my tuner and he says only a hack would do what you mentioned above. My friend and tuner writes binary hex files, code the ecu and re write the files. He and another local guy here were part of the FJO program who designed and makes all the HOLLEY EFI that now runs serious drag cars. These same 2 guys I know have been to GM headquarters as part of the 5 best tuners in the world who did work on the shared gm ford agreements for ecu tcm stuff. FJO is from Winnipeg which is where we are from. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Boostpatrol said:

Yes. Do you know how efi live people get the software to the point they can release it to the public? They get the ability from beta testers like the guy tuning my truck. Hes done hundreds of GMCs like mine. 

Really, that's how technology advances? Learn something new everyday :rolleyes:

 

So now you're claiming that he's tuned hundreds (so more than 200) of 2017+ T87A TCMs without using HP Tuners to unlock them? And not one of those people have posted up this information on any forum anywhere? Think about that for a second...the people that have their T87As tuned, via a secretive NO UNLOCK SERVICE no less, are not your average joe shmoe, they are obviously into modding their trucks and would most likely follow some forum somewhere.

 

51 minutes ago, Boostpatrol said:

I ran this by my tuner and he says only a hack would do what you mentioned above. My friend and tuner writes binary hex files, code the ecu and re write the files. He and another local guy here were part of the FJO program who designed and makes all the HOLLEY EFI that now runs serious drag cars. These same 2 guys I know have been to GM headquarters as part of the 5 best tuners in the world who did work on the shared gm ford agreements for ecu tcm stuff. FJO is from Winnipeg which is where we are from. 

Only a hack would have the T87A unlocked via HP Tuners? I guess every single person that has tuned their T87A is a hack then because THAT'S THE ONLY WAY IT CAN BE DONE AT THE MOMENT.

 

Swapping the TCMs is obviously a hack - it's pretty much the definition of the work hack. But that's a way around having to pay for the HPT unlock service.

 

It's nice that your friend has so many credentials, but what you have to understand is that you're making a claim that to date is impossible. I'm calling BS on this one. I'll eat my words if it comes down to it, but this is a classic case of "pictures or it didn't happen." AND BELIEVE ME, I HOPE THAT I'M WRONG, BUT MY GUT SAYS I'M NOT.

Posted
On 4/20/2019 at 10:19 PM, Mileguru said:

Post up your results when it's done. Hope it's not another swing and a miss situation with these T87A units.

And Justin at BlackBear, if you see this post, any new news about EFI Live being able to tune the T87A?

We still do not see EFILive being able to unlock the 8 speed TCM for the 2017 and newer vehicles in the foreseeable future.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I know its not the place for it but I don't have 50 posts to post otherwise, I sold my Sierra and have my BBP tuner i'd like to off load. So anyone on the fence want to get a cheaper price shoot me a message. You will still need to buy a tune/license from bbp though. Sorry for not posting right but I have no reasons to post to make 50 now that I don't have a GMT

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 4/21/2019 at 6:37 AM, Boostpatrol said:

The results from this tune will be 18 whp peak, 32 whp mid range, 45 wtq peak. 

Intakes also are a waste of money and provide no gains while no air box provides no gains aswell. Headers and cat deletes also provide a loss in torque. This is why the only mod I did was a kn panel filter. The stock air box flows 700 hp on duramax before needing modification.

While I have no interest in the argument you’re having with Mileguru, I am not sure your comments about intakes and airboxes are universally applicable.  

 

For about 15 years I was deeply into Duramaxes and with a turbo diesel and the intakes on the LB7, LMM, and LML, there wasn’t much of an advantage until you exceeded 550 RWHP.  And as we all know getting that much HP out of a Duramax is easy so there was a lot of testing done at HP levels over 550 RWHP.  

 

I think it’s different with naturally aspirated GM pickups.  Blackbear’s posted dyno results confirm what intake manufacturers are showing with their own dyno results.  Now I suppose one can argue it’s in Blackbear’s best interest to confirm the dyno results since they sell those products.  However, when you look at all these posted dyno results, they do show all the parameters and for the results to be fabricated would mean that all these companies are lying and hoping not to get caught.  I think that is less believable than the claims of 10-20 HP increases with an Intake.  

 

Another reason I am inclined to believe the intakes help at stock HP levels is because a naturally aspirated engine has to suck in all the air it uses.  A turbo (or supercharged) engine forces air in and is much better able to overcome any restrictions in the airbox/intake system.  So an improvement in flow that won’t help a turboed engine may very well help a naturally aspirated engine.

Edited by INTJ
Posted
Appears this thread is slowly dying.  Looking for custom tune options for my 2018 Sierra 6.2L with 8-speed.


I’m like you. I have a 2018 Silverado 6.2L with and am looking to tune. However, I don’t want the tune to void the warranty. Does anyone know how to get around that?

Thanks,

RC

92b49f974bf5b18e74cbbd64b89fd755.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

To take the least amount of risk we can’t do anything to our trucks.  There are some dealerships that are that fussy about any mods.  Other dealerships are less fussy.  Also, I don’t think we even have to use the dealer for warranty and extended warranty work—just need an approved repair facility, though I would thoroughly research that first.

 

So the question becomes how much risk are we willing to take?  The extreme end of the spectrum is putting a BIG HP tune in a Duramax.  If we thrash the trans while doing that we aren’t going to get warranty coverage and rightly so.  On the other end, putting an intake, cat back, and mild tune in a gas engine is unlikely to make enough extra power to break anything.  

 

I am am doing an AFE intake, Borla cat back, and Superchips tune for my year-old 2018 5.3 with 13,000 miles on it. Superchips said that an intake and cat back with their canned performance  tune will add about 30 HP.  The risk of breaking something with that is very low, and if I do need warranty work I’ll put the stock tune back in and maybe the stock intake.  Most dealers I have dealt with say to bring it in stock—I don’t expect any issue with a cat back.  

 

With two different tuned Duramaxes all I did was flash back to stock and the dealer covered the repair, but the warranty items were small—a sensor and a TCM.  I wasn’t trying to cover a fried transmission.  Big tunes in the Duramax without beefing the trans and then trying to get warranty on damaged drivetrain components are a big part of why GM got so fussy about mods and warranty, Magnuson-Moss Act notwithstanding.

 

Also, Superchips offers a two-year powertrain warranty, which eases the risk even more.

 

 

Edited by INTJ
Posted

I would like to see those numbers as well, but I’d bet that even a 30 RWHP increase would only gain about .3 sec in the 1/4 mile.  That said, I am more concerned about mid range power increases.  That may not have as much of an improvement in 1/4 mile times but will help response and acceleration in and out of traffic at cruising speeds.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

There is a GM TSB out (#09-06-04-026P) that explains how dealers can check calibration history in certain "newer" ECMs and TCMs using a Tech2; MDI or MDI2 and GDS2. The Calibration Verification Number [CVN] (checksum) for each programming module is stored in protected NVRAM inside the computer and can be compared to what's on file with GM. If the calibration history shows a modified CVN, GM can void your warranty. So it won't do any good to reflash your module back to stock before taking your vehicle in for warranty service, because the dealer can see if it had a modified tune on it previously.

Edited by SinisterZ71
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 5/28/2019 at 1:36 PM, Racindave said:

So does anyone have any real performance numbers after a tune? Maybe before and after 1/4 mile times?

0-60

before 5.7

after 4.9

 

2014 dbl cab 6.2, bone stock with BB tune

 

I’m pretty sure most of that is from modification of torque management, not the power increase.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

0-60

before 5.7

after 4.9

 

2014 dbl cab 6.2, bone stock with BB tune

 

I’m pretty sure most of that is from modification of torque management, not the power increase.

 

 

 

 

 

Can you post your tune parameters? How does it shift under load?

Posted
38 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

0-60

before 5.7

after 4.9

 

2014 dbl cab 6.2, bone stock with BB tune

 

I’m pretty sure most of that is from modification of torque management, not the power increase.

 

 

 

 

 

That’s pretty a good improvement. Thanks! 

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, Bammer25 said:

Can you post your tune parameters? How does it shift under load?

Its a BB tune, no idea what the tune parameters are. Justin tuned my truck in person and it’s been like that ever since.

 

shifts are rock solid at WOT. Little sloppy at part throttle. Could email BB to fix but too lazy.

Edited by truckguy82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...