Jump to content

The official ordering, production & delivery thread - 2019 Silverado / Sierra

Zane
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Null99
Null99

Built 10/16 brought it home 10/24. 

lt1z
lt1z

Picked up my Double Cab AT4 today. Really pleased with how my order came out. I picked the right trim, options and color.

BeardBros
BeardBros

Brought it home today!   TIMELINE FROM ORDER TO DELIVERY 10/29/18 - Ordered the all new T1 2019 Silverado High Country, Crew Cab Short Box, 6.2L with 10 speed trans., Tech Package, N

Posted Images

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, dane0254 said:

Picked up the truck today. This thing rides nice and the power is awesome. Love this thing. 

2020 Trail Boss Front.jpg

For now.... but you might be surprised in a year or so or few months and find yourself hating it.    But black is beautiful. 

disneybaker Enthusiast

disneybaker

Posted
Posted
For now.... but you might be surprised in a year or so or few months and find yourself hating it.    But black is beautiful. 

I love my black suburban, everyone said you’ll hate black, it’s the first black vehicle my first car 25 years ago,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
mcgee500 Enthusiast

mcgee500

Posted
Posted
On 2/15/2020 at 6:06 PM, dane0254 said:

Picked up the truck today. This thing rides nice and the power is awesome. Love this thing. 

2020 Trail Boss Front.jpg

What are those emblems on your hood? Are they 6.2L

VexatiousGlove New Member

VexatiousGlove

Posted
Posted
On 2/4/2020 at 4:15 PM, S10jimmy said:

Just got a call from my local dealership. I placed an order for a 2020 trail boss double cab with the 6.2 with the 10-speed transmission in September. I put down the deposit and placed my order. I was told the production date would be the week of January 13th . I hadn't heard anything from the dealership yet so I placed a call yesterday to find out what was going on. Today I received a call back from the dealership saying that even though they took my deposit and Chevy excepted the order , Chevy is not going to produce the double cab trail boss with the 6.2 l motor !! My order hasn't been canceled by  Chevrolet yet , and they told the dealer that they will probably not be producing that truck at all ! I can't f'ing believe this !! 

 

 

Hey man, any updates on your situation? I went to the dealership to order a 2020 custom trail boss double cab with the 6.2 last week. They didn't mention anything about not being able to acquire one. I put the deposit down and haven't heard anything, not that I expect to...its been less than a week. Were you able to get it sorted out?

Tr3kker Enthusiast

Tr3kker

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, disneybaker said:

Is it possible to change or add to an ordered vehicle after it’s submitted


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope. I considered adding tow mirrors after my dealership submitted the build and they said it’s not possible to make changes after GM accepts the build from the dealership.

disneybaker Enthusiast

disneybaker

Posted
Posted
Nope. I considered adding tow mirrors after my dealership submitted the build and they said it’s not possible to make changes after GM accepts the build from the dealership.

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chrisd534 Enthusiast

Chrisd534

Posted
Posted
On 2/21/2020 at 11:13 AM, disneybaker said:

Is it possible to change or add to an ordered vehicle after it’s submitted


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

On 2/21/2020 at 2:18 PM, Tr3kker said:

Nope. I considered adding tow mirrors after my dealership submitted the build and they said it’s not possible to make changes after GM accepts the build from the dealership.

I think they're giving you the run around.. I was in the same situation wanted to add tow mirrors and my order was submitted. Dealer had no issues changing it for me. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • BCGM
      Remote Start Noise 2024 2500 HD Gas

      By BCGM · Posted

      Okay Punch What year is your truck or did you already mention that ? Can you link the TSB is about that noise ? 
    • newdude
      2027 3.0 l Duramax

      By newdude · Posted

      Thrust bearing is a very small window.  But nice try.   Turbo oil filter?  Haven't seen any failures.  Change your oil more frequently.  Use a better oil than the factory oil.  
    • newdude
      2026 sierra bad brake controller

      By newdude · Posted

      There is a p/n called out in the one PI that GM has.  Curt 57003 inline load adapter that is used for LED trailers that are having trouble with these newer trucks.  No cutting, no splicing, etc.  GM did update the lighting module around 2023 to better pick up trailers with LED lighting, but it still can happen.     Here's the link to the Curt site for it - 7-Way RV Blade LED Electrical Adapter (Not a Wiring Extension) SKU #57003 by CURT   The PI I am referencing - MC-10208985-9999.pdf   Its not just a GM deal either.  Newer Fords and Rams have this same problem.       In another PI, they recommend that the trailer has a Pollock brand 7 way on it as that is who makes the truck sides for the OEMs.  GM is also big on making sure the trailer is trouble free.  So no wiring issues, all lights are functional, better quality 7 way plug, etc.     The other PI I am referencing - MC-10178359-9999.pdf   The model year range is older but it is the current PI for 2014-2026.  It calls out the Pollock RV HD 7 way they recommend.  
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.   The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.   The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.   I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.   Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.   I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.     That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.   Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.  
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...