Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ve got an AT4 in transit. I chatted and it said it was in Birmingham with an ETA of July 23. Is that an ETA till my dealer in TN gets it? Wonder when I can expect to pick it up. 

Posted (edited)

Looks like those of us 4D00 MP won’t be seeing anything until end of August or Sept. at the earliest. (Counting shipping time and etc).

 

Unless they keep crews finishing the produced trucks during the week idle time.

Edited by Nolen83
Posted

With the announcement over a month ago from the GM executives that “help is on the way”, I expected there to be a lot more movement.  My dealer and my order have seen none.  The only thing working in my favor at this point is the deal I negotiated on the truck back in January when I ordered it.  I would much rather have the truck though.  
 

Never thought I’d see the end of July without seeing the truck.   GM must be ok with absorbing the cost of building it and letting it sit with 6 months.  

Posted

I guess I'm the newest member of this not so desirable club!  Looked at a 1500 LT that was listed as, "in Transit," to a local dealer for several days and then I put a deposit on a purchase order for this vehicle on July 2.  I figured that if it was, "in transit," then it should be here in a week or so, right? 

 

After two weeks I inquired of the dealer who said he had no information and could not get any.  I chatted on Chevrolet.com and they said, " as of July 9, 2021 your vehicle is bade in distribution center in Baltimore Maryland waiting for the carrier to pick up the vehicle for dispatch."  They said they would call me on Monday. I said fine.  Here is how that went : "I received a call on Monday from a lady with a very strong accent that was hard to understand. She said she was calling for Jeff. She said there was good news that my car was shipped. She said it was in Ohio shipping by rail to Florida. I said this made no sense because I was told on this messaging service on Friday that it was in Baltimore, MD, which is about 130 miles from the dealer in Ashland, VA.  Ohio is about 500 miles from the dealer and Florida is about 800 miles from the dealer. She talked about distribution centers and vehicle inspections and said my car was in shipment. I asked her when it would be at the dealer. She said I should call the dealer. I told her the dealer had no information. I told her this was not acceptable and totally useless information. I asked her where she was calling from and she replied, " The Philippines."

 

I chatted at Chevrolet.com the next day and, after a long delay, they said the truck was in Baltimore, event description 4000, awaiting inspection and shipment, and advised checking with the dealer.  Of course, the dealer knows nothing! So, here I am in limbo along with the rest of you!

 

 

Posted

GM doesn’t care!  They tell you to call the dealer like they’re the ones building it.  Meanwhile it sits in the parking lot beside the factory and GM tells you they can’t talk to anyone who works at the factory to find out when it’ll be completed.

Posted (edited)

Can someone point me to the answer to my production questions?

 

I ordered a 2022 Sierra 3500HS LTE double cab, long bed.  They gave me a set of pages listing the build that looked like a variant off the GM web site format.  A few days later I made a couple changes and they sent back pages in a different format that I believe is the output from the dealer's ordering group entry into the GM production database (I am calling it the GM database..it is probably called something different).  Looking over this second set of pages I found many missing options.

 

After another session at the dealer, it appears that when the order is entered in the GM database, the components to a package that will actually be included at that time are chosen by GM.  For example, Driver Alert I or 2, may only have some of the components you believe will be included from their sales literature.  In my case such items as Rear Cross Traffic Alert (UFG), Lane Departure Warning (UFL) and many more are not included.  WOW!  The cost of a package is less because components are missing but still that does not help me meet my requirements.

 

Is it a weekly crap shoot to have the dealer review the order every week to see if it can be locked in when all the components are offered for a package?  What should be expected these days ordering a truck?

 

Thanks,

Pat

Edited by mobilelists
Posted (edited)
On 7/11/2021 at 10:25 PM, dascenc said:

I just traded in my 2020 RST 4x4 Z71 with 17K miles and they gave me 50K for it. Used ones are currently going for 52+ in my area. Mid 40s is where I bought it last year before everything took a nosedive. 

Well, after shopping around for the past few weeks, I was able to purchase a '21 Cherry Red Crew cab RST with the Z71 pkg.  I just picked it up today. 

 

Edited by mrbflat
Posted
15 hours ago, mrbflat said:

Well, after shopping around for the past few weeks, I was able to purchase a '21 Cherry Red Crew cab RST with the Z71 pkg.  I just picked it up today. 

 

 

Love that color!  We need some pics when you get the time. 👍

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, mrbflat said:

Well, after shopping around for the past few weeks, I was able to purchase a '21 Cherry Red Crew cab RST with the Z71 pkg.  I just picked it up today. 

 

We had a pretty big thunderstorm last night, so I really couldn't get any pics. This is a quick shot I took this morning.  I didn't even realize they changed from the Cajun Red to this Cherry Red for '21. 

20210728_064852.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Still have not received much update other than it is fully produced and waiting in Mexico for the rail yet.   Built in Feb.  I'm sick of GM telling us to call the dealers.  My dealer has excalated as high as they can. 

Posted

My dealer doesn't even pretend anyone can help me anymore. He says their reps have no information or options. I'm standing by my order just because the same truck will cost me $7000 more if I start over. They have got 30 trucks in this month. Not one is mine. One truck load from Mexico and the rest from Fort Wayne where my truck is. 

Posted (edited)
On 7/22/2021 at 10:54 AM, SLTBlue said:

With the announcement over a month ago from the GM executives that “help is on the way”, I expected there to be a lot more movement.  My dealer and my order have seen none.  The only thing working in my favor at this point is the deal I negotiated on the truck back in January when I ordered it.  I would much rather have the truck though.  
 

Never thought I’d see the end of July without seeing the truck.   GM must be ok with absorbing the cost of building it and letting it sit with 6 months.  

 

My guess is it is actually favorable to their P&L to incur the storage costs if it allows manufacturing to continue.  If they are manufacturing, the costs to build the truck (labor, utilities, etc.) can be capitalized to inventory.  More importantly it also allows them to capitalize the costs of related building and machinery/equipment depreciation as well.  If the factory is idle, those costs may have to go directly to P&L.  For sure it uses more cash in the short term that goes on the balance sheet as inventory, but that is favorable to short term expense.  Either way, any profit margin is deferred until the product is actual sold.

 

In normal years, the concern is whether the inventory can be sold at a profit.  Seems this year that shouldn't be an issue, but time will tell.

 

 

  

Edited by GullLakeMi
Posted
14 hours ago, SLTBlue said:

Same exact situation here, so at least you’re in good company.  
 

What has your dealer done to “escalate” it? 

GM Rep has made calls to try and get it and also the Zone Manager. Clearly there is no orderly fashion at the plants/storage area.  Chip was put in back in June.  At that point you would think send it to the Rail.  

Posted
5 hours ago, GMCFAN21 said:

GM Rep has made calls to try and get it and also the Zone Manager. Clearly there is no orderly fashion at the plants/storage area.  Chip was put in back in June.  At that point you would think send it to the Rail.  

A Chevy chat rep told me a couple of weeks ago that there was an update as of 6/28 that said it was released from quality control. At the time I thought it meant the chip had been installed and I got happy. A month later still no shipment, but if you also heard something similar maybe it really is just waiting for shipment. Not sure if I should be hopeful or even more pissed at that hah.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...