Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

silverado 18 bowtie.jpeg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
9-11-2019

 

General Motors has announced that NHTSA is mandating a safety recall for the following vehicles:

  • 2014-2018 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra Pickups (1500 / 2500 / 3500)
  • 2015-2018 Chevrolet Suburban, Tahoe, GMC Yukon vehicles 
  • 2015-2017 Cadillac Escalade

 

NHTSA reports that the amount of vacuum created by the vacuum pump may decrease over time. The group says that as the vacuum level drops, the brake assist decreases, and that this increasing braking effort, extending the distance required to stop the vehicle, thereby increasing the risk of a crash. This new recall covers 3.4 million vehicles

 

The Problem: The brake pump uses engine oil to lubricate itself. If the pump becomes clogged with engine oil sludge the units ability to create vaccum is diminished over time. As a result, braking force and ability also drops. The issue is usually accompanied by a "Service Brake Assist" warning message in the dash. 

 

The Fix: GM will reprogram the computer that controls the secondary brake assist pump. The secondary pump will now activate at lower speeds and different situations quicker to compensate for any lost output from the main pump. Since the pumps are not failing, GM has decided not to replace them.

 

GM's number for this recall is N192268490. In compliance with federal law, GM will notify owners, typically by snail mail. GM says that its dealers will reprogram the Electronic Brake Control Module. However, GM has not yet provided a notification schedule. Owners may contact Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-630-2438, Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or GMC customer service at 1-800-462-8782.

 

If you own one of these vehicles and wish to check to see if your vehicle is included (or not) you can do so at this link immediately.

 

As with every safety recall, customers will not be charged by GM for the needed repairs or modifications. 

 

NHTSA's public information on this issue indicates that many accidents have been reported to NHTSA including some with injuries. This recall is the result of a NHTSA investigation that lasted nearly a year. In its investigation report, NHTSA noted the following details about the problem:

 

Quote

These conditions are attributed to deterioration of the engine-driven brake assist vacuum pump. Nine of these incidents included vehicles incurring damage as a result colliding with another vehicle or fixed object at low speeds. The brake assist vacuum pump is driven by an accessory belt on the engine and serves as the source of power brake vacuum in the subject vehicles. Over time, the pump's capacity to generate vacuum may deteriorate. The subject vehicles receive supplemental hydraulic brake assist from the ABS system, albeit at lower levels than the vacuum-powered primary system. If the brake assist vacuum pump fails to operate as intended, the amount of brake power assist supplied to the driver can be significantly reduced, extending the subject vehicle stopping distance.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Looks like enough people complained to NHTSA about their sudden rock hard brake pedal and GM was forced to issue recall. 

 

I can set the service brake assist off just by pumping brake pedal a few times idling at a stoplight. My 2018 has the revised pump. Aka 2 piece pump (black cover on back) vs the early 1 piece cast pump. 

Edited by 2018GMC
Posted

Well shoot! It doesn't look like they'll foot the bill for new brakes, which at about 64k miles I think I need because they are starting to pulsate when I brake now.

Posted
11 minutes ago, NoProblem said:

Well shoot! It doesn't look like they'll foot the bill for new brakes, which at about 64k miles I think I need because they are starting to pulsate when I brake now.

Why would they pay for new rotors and pads? Booster is the issue. What you have is normal wear. 

  • Like 3
Posted

I'm all the more happy now that I did NOT buy a leftover new 2018 1500 back in March, but went with at 2019 T1 instead. 

 

What a huge recall, though. Wow. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, econometrics said:

I'm all the more happy now that I did NOT buy a leftover new 2018 1500 back in March, but went with at 2019 T1 instead. 

 

What a huge recall, though. Wow. 

Hope I am wrong but just give ya 19 some time......

 

Yotaman

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Yotaman said:

Hope I am wrong but just give ya 19 some time......

 

Yotaman

Who knows. But the whole brake system is very improved for 2019, so I'm feeling pretty good about it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, econometrics said:

I'm all the more happy now that I did NOT buy a leftover new 2018 1500 back in March, but went with at 2019 T1 instead. 

 

What a huge recall, though. Wow. 

It looks like some are having issues with their 2019.

 

Who knows if it's the same problem though but for knowledge and what not.

 

Posted

i have a 2018 1500 but when i do the vin search its says theres no recall. is it not all 2014-2018?

  • Like 1
Posted

The fix by gm is a joke. All there doing is some programming. Just a band aid fix. I didn't even know we had a secondary pump. On my 2018 Sierra with only 6000 miles when i stop at a stop sign and i pump the brakes they get very hard. I have never had a problem with normal braking.

  • Like 1
Posted

153000 miles and no issues.  Strange, I didn't even know it had a vacuum pump. Just the good old fashioned brake booster.

 

I wonder if the issues are related to deferred maintenance.  Not changing the oil often enough.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, BillthePainter said:

153000 miles and no issues.  Strange, I didn't even know it had a vacuum pump. Just the good old fashioned brake booster.

 

I wonder if the issues are related to deferred maintenance.  Not changing the oil often enough.

 

I thought the same thing... coming up on 80,000 on mine, and still the best feeling brake system I've ever had underneath me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It really is comical when people don’t agree or see the reason some people prefer the older vehicles. They become condescending. All the while they may be busting their knuckles on old vehicles. I have found memories of swapping out engines in my old GM cars in a weekend without much hassle. Unlike today. One wrong move a computer will shut you down. Even on something as easy as a brake job. There’s a pretty comical YouTuber called the car wizard. A garage owner who puts it all in perspective. Another Vicegrip garage that’s shows just how tough the old stuff is. 
    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...